Si no visualiza correctamente este E-Mail haga
(Link->http://v2.envialosimple.com/campaign/htmlversion?AdministratorID=20023&CampaignID=1&StatisticID=1&MemberID=6267&s=14767a3c19522ca75f0cbc46ea6c4da2&isDemo=0)
(Link->http://www.mundovillamorra.com.py)
Para desuscribirse de nuestra lista hag
I'm very sorry for delayed reply.now SR-IOV works for me in Centos
6.3,thank all of you.
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Linux normally uses the resource assignments done by the BIOS, but it
> is possible for the kernel to reassign those. We don't have good
> automatic s
We're using Fedora 3.4.2-1.fc16.x86_64
Clarification on our interface (not using eth0).
p19p1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:80:50:05:23:64
inet addr:192.168.240.2 Bcast:192.168.240.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::280:50ff:fe05:2364/64 Scope:Link
UP
Hi
I just tried to run latest kernel on my DH55HC motherboard latest
kernel 3.6.6 and got various network problems, such as network traffic
are stopping, and sometimes i am getting kernel panic.
When traffic are stopping, ethtool -r eth0 sometimes helps.
When i do ethtool -G eth0 rx NNN , someti
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Gao [mailto:pkill.2...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 5:38 AM
> To: bhelg...@google.com; Rose, Gregory V; Li, Sibai
> Cc: ddut...@redhat.com; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; linux-kernel; netdev; kvm; e1000-
> de...@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-...@vg
On 11/13/2012 11:04 AM, Li, Sibai wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jason Gao [mailto:pkill.2...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 5:38 AM
>> To: bhelg...@google.com; Rose, Gregory V; Li, Sibai
>> Cc: ddut...@redhat.com; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; linux-kernel; netdev; kvm; e1
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Li, Sibai wrote:
>
>>
>> Thank you very much,I try "pci=realloc" in Centos 6.3,and now it works for
>> me.
>>
>> thank you Sibai,Our server "Dell R710",its BIOS version is just
>> v.6.3.0 and release date is 07/24/2012,and I also configured intel_iommu=on
>> in
>
> -Original Message-
> From: yhlu.ker...@gmail.com [mailto:yhlu.ker...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Yinghai Lu
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 10:17 AM
> To: Li, Sibai
> Cc: Jason Gao; bhelg...@google.com; Rose, Gregory V; ddut...@redhat.com;
> Kirsher, Jeffrey T; linux-kernel; netdev; kvm
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Li, Sibai wrote:
>
> Never append "pci=realloc" for both kernel 2.6.32.279 and kernel 3.5.0 above.
well, can you both post boot log with "debug ignore_loglevel" ?
--
Monitor your physic
>-Original Message-
>From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
>On Behalf Of Denys Fedoryshchenko
>Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 5:59 AM
>To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W; Wyborny,
>Carolyn; Skidmore, Donald C; Rose, Gregory V; Wask
On 2012-11-13 21:41, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
>>-Original Message-
>>From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org
>> [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
>>On Behalf Of Denys Fedoryshchenko
>>Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 5:59 AM
>>To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W; Wyborny,
>-Original Message-
>From: Michael Beavington [mailto:mbeav...@pt.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 6:02 AM
>To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] Q. Default VLAN erroneous behaviour?
>
>We're using Fedora 3.4.2-1.fc16.x86_64
>
>Clarification on our interfac
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Friesen [mailto:chris.frie...@genband.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 1:43 PM
> To: Levy, Lior
> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Allan, Bruce W; Brandeburg,
> Jesse; Ronciak, John
> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] BUG? strange behavior with vlan
On 11/13/2012 04:48 PM, Vick, Matthew wrote:
> I took a look at this with Carolyn and I believe what you're seeing
> is the expected behavior. In these older kernels, there was no
> ethtool option to turn on and off VLAN stripping on the fly. If you
> look, the get_flags operation just calls ethto
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Friesen [mailto:chris.frie...@genband.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 3:31 PM
> To: Vick, Matthew
> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Allan, Bruce W; Ronciak, John;
> Brandeburg, Jesse
> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] BUG? strange behavior with vl
On 11/09/12 04:35, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
> All devices in path from root complex to 82571, should have *same* max
> payload size otherwise it can cause hang.
> Can you double check this?
Hi Tushar,
Checked with hardware vendor and they said no way to modify the max payload
size
from BIOS, can
于 2012年11月09日 04:35, Dave, Tushar N 写道:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
>> On Behalf Of Joe Jin
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 10:25 PM
>> To: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net
>> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.k
>-Original Message-
>From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 6:48 PM
>To: Dave, Tushar N
>Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>ker...@vger.kernel.org; Mary Mcgrath
>Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
>
>On 11/09/12
>-Original Message-
>From: Li Yu [mailto:raise.s...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 7:37 PM
>To: Dave, Tushar N
>Cc: Joe Jin; e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>ker...@vger.kernel.org; Mary Mcgrath
>Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
>
>于 2
On 11/13/2012 05:53 PM, Wyborny, Carolyn wrote:
>> From: Chris Friesen [mailto:chris.frie...@genband.com]
>> With the older kernel but the latest igb/igbvf drivers we're having
>> issues as follows:
>>
>> We can send vlan-tagged packets from a different system and they
>> are received in the VMs
20 matches
Mail list logo
