On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, 21:11 Ran Shalit, wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:23 PM, Alexander Duyck
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Ran Shalit
> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 6:27 PM, Alexander Duyck
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 9:07 AM, Ran Shalit
> wrote:
> >
Hi,
I am trying to work with intel i210 IT NIC interface card on ARM platform for
AVB development using modified IGB AVB driver provided by OpenAvnu.
This card is working fine on Linux based PC with modified IGB AVB driver
provided by OpenAvnu community. This card has PCIe x1 connecting inter
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:59 AM, James Courtier-Dutton
wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, 21:11 Ran Shalit, wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:23 PM, Alexander Duyck
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Ran Shalit
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 6:27 PM, Alexander Duyck
>
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:59 AM, James Courtier-Dutton
wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, 21:11 Ran Shalit, wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:23 PM, Alexander Duyck
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Ran Shalit
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 6:27 PM, Alexander Duyck
>
You really need to ask the OpenAVNU guys on their mailing list.
We don't have a lot of ARM platforms here so I'd suggest asking someone outside
of Intel.
Todd Fujinaka
Software Application Engineer
Datacenter Engineering Group
Intel Corporation
todd.fujin...@intel.com
-Original Message-
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 7:02 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
> When configuring the rx part of the interface, the e1000_main.c module
> enables receive on the adapter before it has initialised the buffer
> addresses. The resulting race with the arrival of the first packet can lead
> to the adapter and the
Hello,
We tested the time it gets for successful boot from powerup, and we
are surprised to see that using a switch in the middle (100M) gives
better result.
I don't understand how it can be.
Please see dmesg for both cases below:
dmesg without switch (longer time for ping):
=
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:33 PM, Ran Shalit wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We tested the time it gets for successful boot from powerup, and we
> are surprised to see that using a switch in the middle (100M) gives
> better result.
> I don't understand how it can be.
Setting up a 100M connection is much simpl
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexander Duyck [mailto:alexander.du...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 3:07 PM
> To: Ran Shalit
> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] How is it that a switch gives better boot time
> ?
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:33
