Re: [E1000-devel] Question regarding e1000 link status

2009-01-22 Thread Brandeburg, Jesse
Jonathan Fournier wrote: >> Sep 19 08:14:43 localhost kernel: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth3: link is >> not ready Sep 19 08:16:54 localhost kernel: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): >> eth2: link is not ready >> >> I'll retry with bare 2.6.27.11 (7.3.20-k3-NAPI), I think the link was >> at least coming up. > > Y

Re: [E1000-devel] Question regarding e1000 link status

2009-01-22 Thread Jonathan Fournier
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Jonathan Fournier wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Brandeburg, Jesse > wrote: >> Jonathan Fournier wrote: so what is the actual connection type on your ethernet, is it a directly connected fiber port? Is it a serdes blade? forgive me I've

Re: [E1000-devel] Question regarding e1000 link status

2009-01-22 Thread Jonathan Fournier
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote: > Jonathan Fournier wrote: >>> so what is the actual connection type on your ethernet, is it a >>> directly connected fiber port? Is it a serdes blade? forgive me >>> I've never tested one of the ATCA platforms. >> >> I just found out mor

Re: [E1000-devel] disable multiqueue for igb in kernel 2.6.28

2009-01-22 Thread Brandeburg, Jesse
Patrick Schreurs wrote: > I can't seem to find an option to disable multiqueue in the igb driver > which comes with the 2.6.28.x kernel. The module parameter IntMode is > not supported. > > With 6 nics operational i now use 54 interrupts. My hardware (Dell > PE1950 / Intel 5000X chipset), spreads

[E1000-devel] disable multiqueue for igb in kernel 2.6.28

2009-01-22 Thread Patrick Schreurs
Hello, I can't seem to find an option to disable multiqueue in the igb driver which comes with the 2.6.28.x kernel. The module parameter IntMode is not supported. With 6 nics operational i now use 54 interrupts. My hardware (Dell PE1950 / Intel 5000X chipset), spreads all interrupts accross al