On 03/08/2015 02:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher
jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com wrote:
[...]
We discussed this during NetConf last week, and Don is correct that a
custom sysfs interface is not the way we want to handle this. We agreed
upon a
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 18:52 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 01:42 +, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
On 03/08/2015 02:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher
jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com wrote:
[...]
We discussed this during NetConf
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 01:42 +, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
On 03/08/2015 02:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher
jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com wrote:
[...]
We discussed this during NetConf last week, and Don is correct
that a
custom sysfs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/08/2015 02:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher
jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com wrote:
[...]
We discussed this during NetConf last week, and Don is correct that a
custom sysfs interface is not the way we
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher
jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com wrote:
[...]
We discussed this during NetConf last week, and Don is correct that a
custom sysfs interface is not the way we want to handle this. We agreed
upon a generic interface so that any NIC is able to turn on or
On 20/02/15 21:05, Skidmore, Donald C wrote:
If a vender specific interface is objectionable maybe a simpler and more
generic interface would be for the PF to be able to set a given VF into
trusted mode... I admit exactly what 'trusted' meant would vary from vender
to vender, but it would
-Original Message-
From: Edward Cree [mailto:ec...@solarflare.com]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 5:53 AM
To: Skidmore, Donald C
Cc: Hiroshi Shimamoto; vyase...@redhat.com; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Alexander
Duyck; Bjørn Mork; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net;
net...@vger.kernel.org;
On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 06:29 -0800, Skidmore, Donald C wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Edward Cree [mailto:ec...@solarflare.com]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 5:53 AM
To: Skidmore, Donald C
Cc: Hiroshi Shimamoto; vyase...@redhat.com; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Alexander
Duyck; Bjørn
On 20/02/15 01:00, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto h-shimam...@ct.jp.nec.com
Add netlink directives and ndo entry to allow VF multicast promiscuous mode.
The administrator wants to allow dedicatedly multicast promiscuous per VF.
If I'm properly understanding, this seems to be
-Original Message-
From: Edward Cree [mailto:ec...@solarflare.com]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 5:52 AM
To: Hiroshi Shimamoto
Cc: Skidmore, Donald C; vyase...@redhat.com; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Alexander
Duyck; Bjørn Mork; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; net...@vger.kernel.org;
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015, Hiroshi Shimamoto h-shimam...@ct.jp.nec.com wrote:
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto h-shimam...@ct.jp.nec.com
Add netlink directives and ndo entry to allow VF multicast promiscuous mode.
The administrator wants to allow dedicatedly multicast promiscuous per VF.
Jeff, Hiroshi, I
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 01:00 +, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto h-shimam...@ct.jp.nec.com
Add netlink directives and ndo entry to allow VF multicast promiscuous
mode.
The administrator wants to allow dedicatedly multicast promiscuous per
VF.
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto h-shimam...@ct.jp.nec.com
Add netlink directives and ndo entry to allow VF multicast promiscuous mode.
The administrator wants to allow dedicatedly multicast promiscuous per VF.
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto h-shimam...@ct.jp.nec.com
Reviewed-by: Hayato Momma
13 matches
Mail list logo
