>On Sunday, April 12, 2009 Charles-François Natali wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>I'm sorry to bother you, but I'm having a weird problem with e1000
>NIC, and I think you might be able to help me figure out what's
>happening - I saw you submitted a patch for a problem dealing with
>socket buffer a few years ago to the e1000 driver.
>So here's the story :
>at work, we have around 300 computers equiped with NICs using e1000 driver.
>From time to time, we see processes stuck in sendto() when sending
>multicast trafic on an interface _that has its link down_.
>First analysis showed that the processes are stuck because their send
>buffer is full. I tried to read te kernel code, and came to the
>conclusion that the only place where the process can possibly be stuck
>is in sock_wait_for_wmem.
>But why ? Since the socket is created after the interface has lost its
>link, the driver has called netif_stop_queue, so, when the device tx
>queue gets full, the packets should be dropped, and the process
>shouldn't sleep.
>The only explanation I see is that the socket send buffer gets full
>before the device txqueue : if there is for example only one process
>sending on this interface, the device txqueue will never get full and
>drop packets, so the process it will remain stuck in
>sock_wait_for_wmem forever.
>
>Thank you for reading that far, hopping you wight have an idea of
>what's going on.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Charles

(adding e1000-devel mailing list)
What kernel version and e1000 driver version are you using?

Cheers,
Jeff


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and 
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. 
Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel

Reply via email to