Re: [E1000-devel] i40e: source for nvmupdate64e? (to clear module qualification)

2016-03-21 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
: Wesley W. Terpstra [mailto:wes...@terpstra.ca] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 3:11 AM To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] i40e: source for nvmupdate64e? (to clear module qualification) Thank you for your feedback, > Also be aware that a large chunk of the NVM im

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e: source for nvmupdate64e? (to clear module qualification)

2016-03-21 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
Thank you for your feedback, > Also be aware that a large chunk of the NVM image is signed and won't > work if the signature and/or checksum is found invalid. I don't remember > if the Qualified Module bits are in the signed portion, but I suspect they > are. The data sheet (Section 6) says

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e: source for nvmupdate64e? (to clear module qualification)

2016-03-20 Thread Nelson, Shannon
> From: Wesley W. Terpstra [mailto:wes...@terpstra.ca] > Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 5:30 AM > > I'm still trying to disable this absurd "qualified module" check so that I > can use some custom optics, and have made some progress. Attached is a > small tool I've been using to poke around the NVM

Re: [E1000-devel] i40e: source for nvmupdate64e? (to clear module qualification)

2016-03-20 Thread Wesley W. Terpstra
I'm still trying to disable this absurd "qualified module" check so that I can use some custom optics, and have made some progress. Attached is a small tool I've been using to poke around the NVM of the X710. All my digging has been informed by what I've read in the i40e driver in kernel 4.5 and