Re: [easybuild] eb issues

I will be attacking NAMD soon, but not sure exactly when. On 04/06/2017 04:43 PM, Siddiqui, Shahzeb wrote: > Hello, > > > > Looking for some help from the community, I have a few issues still pending. > > > > https://github.com/hpcugent/easybuild-easyconfigs/issues/4446 > >

[easybuild] eb issues

Hello, Looking for some help from the community, I have a few issues still pending. https://github.com/hpcugent/easybuild-easyconfigs/issues/4446 https://github.com/hpcugent/easybuild-easyconfigs/issues/4443 https://github.com/hpcugent/easybuild-easyconfigs/issues/4413 Shahzeb Siddiqui HPC

RE: [easybuild] Readthedocs EasyBuild dynamic data (program-output)

Hi Ken, So it seems like you are using shell commands to append "rst commands" into .rst files which makes sphinx generate the commands. This is nice trick. I will give this a shot. Thanks From: easybuild-requ...@lists.ugent.be [mailto:easybuild-requ...@lists.ugent.be] On Behalf Of Kenneth

Re: [easybuild] Readthedocs EasyBuild dynamic data (program-output)

On 04/04/2017 23:59, Siddiqui, Shahzeb wrote: Hello, Our team is looking at Sphinx for documentation and we are hoping to use Readthedocs building the documentation. One feature we have is the ability to present dynamic data using program-output which runs a shell-script and presents the

Re: [easybuild] Bootstrap specific EasyBuild version

Hi, Thanks to all who responded with suggestions how to bootstrap a specific version! Looks like "there is more than one way to do it" except for a Perl wrapper ;) Cheers, Pi > On 06 Apr 2017, at 00:29, Fotis Georgatos wrote: > > Hi Damian, all, > > On Apr 5, 2017, at

Re: [easybuild] Does this make sense? (if so, would it make sense to your users?)

I’d argue that binutils are not compilers, and that they are irrelevant for most users. Besides that, looks good to me. We have a similar table on a per-stage basis, but it is currently only exposed to our internal group. Damian On 06/04/17 06:13, "easybuild-requ...@lists.ugent.be on behalf of

Re: [easybuild] Does this make sense? (if so, would it make sense to your users?)

Ohhh, totally missed that one I'm lazy just like the users, I don't read documentation :-) On 04/06/2017 08:38 AM, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > > > On 06/04/2017 08:32, Åke Sandgren wrote: >> Can we steal that text? We use HMNS so we need to change it accordingly >> but having the details on

Re: [easybuild] Does this make sense? (if so, would it make sense to your users?)

On 06/04/2017 08:32, Åke Sandgren wrote: Can we steal that text? We use HMNS so we need to change it accordingly but having the details on what each toolchain consists of is a good idea. See also http://easybuild.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Common-toolchains.html ? K. On 04/06/2017 06:13

Re: [easybuild] Does this make sense? (if so, would it make sense to your users?)

Hi Jack, I gave this a quick read, and it makes sense to me. I do suspect it will be too much for some novice users, for some definition of 'novice', e.g. people who barely know what a compiler is, etc. Maybe some kind of compatibility matrix of full vs subtoolchains would be interesting,

Re: [easybuild] Does this make sense? (if so, would it make sense to your users?)

Can we steal that text? We use HMNS so we need to change it accordingly but having the details on what each toolchain consists of is a good idea. On 04/06/2017 06:13 AM, Jack Perdue wrote: > Howdy all, > > At some point in the past year I blatantly lied to Kenneth > by claiming we had a web page