Re: [easybuild] Skip intels cpu feature indicator in order to reuse modules from the intel toolchain on AMD?

Dear Mikaael, That's a bug in intel/2018a. Unfortunately, you should use the right -m option (for example -mAVX2) Sincerely, Balazs On 04/04/2018 16:06, Mikael Öhman wrote: Sorry if this is a bit off-topic; Since EasyBuild uses -xHost or equivalent, intel puts some cpu-feature-indicator

Re: [easybuild] pandoc installation

Thanks a lot Alan!! that did work: sources = [{ > 'filename': 'pandoc-1.19.2-1-amd64.deb', > 'extract_cmd': 'ar p %s data.tar.gz | tar xvz --strip-components 3 ', > }] Best, Arnau 2018-04-05 15:45 GMT+02:00 Alan O'Cais : > Hi Arnau, > > I think you're looking for

Re: [easybuild] Skip intels cpu feature indicator in order to reuse modules from the intel toolchain on AMD?

I just forget most important, use `--optarch=mAVX2` (or similar) switch for easybuild (or set the corresponding environmental variable) On 06/04/2018 08:20, Balázs Hajgató wrote: Dear Mikaael, That's a bug in intel/2018a. Unfortunately, you should use the right -m option (for example

Re: [easybuild] Skip intels cpu feature indicator in order to reuse modules from the intel toolchain on AMD?

Dear Miakel, Ok, I have re-read the whole stuff. If you compile something on Intel cpu with -xHOST or -xYYZZ, where YYZZ is the highest code-extension (like for example CORE-AVX2), it will only run on Intel cpu. If you compile something on non-intel CPU with -xHOST, then it should fall

[easybuild] no checksums in the plumed 2.4.0 easyconfigs

Hi, I am having a play with Plumed and noticed there are no checksums in the plumed 2.4.0 easy configs. I thought the testing blocks such pull requests. Is there a reason for this? If not I can do the “upgrade” to Plumed 2.4.0 in the current develop and master branch (3 configs). I intend