Re: [easybuild] Redhead/CentOS 7.4 and Intel compiler issues

Dear All, I am wondering if this error is associated with the bug reported by intel with glibc. https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-compiler-not-compatible-with-glibc-224-9-and-newer Code compiled with newer versions of the Intel compilers may result in unexpected numerical values

Re: [easybuild] Redhead/CentOS 7.4 and Intel compiler issues

Dear Åke, Thanks. Best wishes, Victor H. Rusu, PhD CSCS Swiss National Supercomputing Centre Via Trevano 131 6900 Lugano Switzerland On 20.11.17, 10:54, "Åke Sandgren" wrote: And it is only the 2018.0.128 version that has shown this specific problem. The

Re: [easybuild] Relaxed hierarchies by relying on MPI ABI compatibility rather than MPI vendor/version.

Dear Damian, I think that this is a very good approach. In principle, it should work for MPI implementations that are part of the MPICH ABI initiative (https://www.mpich.org/abi/) We do make use of this ABI compatibility for the container usage at Piz Daint

Re: [easybuild] request for testing/feedback: HashedEasyBuildMNS

Dear All, I agree with Vasileios, if you want I can share my version of the MoonEasyBuildMNS based on https://gist.github.com/miklb/ed145757971096565723. I think the Moon phases are more consistent and fit better to the mood of the support team personnel, something that random time hashes