I believe Qt is the best GUI toolkit currently available for any
language.
On Wed, 1 May 2013, Jason Sewall wrote:
> I meant that EQL is some version of ECL distributed with custom Qt
> bindings. The downside is that upstream changes in ECL may or may not
> be available in EQL until the maintai
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Mark Cox wrote:
>> , partially because of its limited development
>> support and partially because of its heavily vertically integrated
>> architecture.
>
> I am not sure what a vertically integrated architecture is, but the limited
> development support can onl
Hi Jason,
On 01/05/2013, at 4:42 AM, Jason Sewall wrote:
> I have a C library I have been working on and I'd like to use (Common)
> Lisp to write a UI to go on top of it.
>
> I first seized upon ECL for the Lisp, since I could easily make an
> interface to the library, and I had a notion at Comm
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 06:08:00PM -0700, Jason Sewall wrote:
> Thanks for your input; perhaps I'll try a little harder to get the
> ECL/commonqt thing working, or perhaps I'll try cl-gtk.
If cl-gtk2 works with ECL, that would be a good way to go. The cl-gtk2
interface is slightly idiosyncratic in
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Matthew Mondor
wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:42:12 -0700
> Jason Sewall wrote:
>
>> I have a C library I have been working on and I'd like to use (Common)
>> Lisp to write a UI to go on top of it.
>>
>> I first seized upon ECL for the Lisp, since I could easily
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:42:12 -0700
Jason Sewall wrote:
> I have a C library I have been working on and I'd like to use (Common)
> Lisp to write a UI to go on top of it.
>
> I first seized upon ECL for the Lisp, since I could easily make an
> interface to the library, and I had a notion at Common
I have a C library I have been working on and I'd like to use (Common)
Lisp to write a UI to go on top of it.
I first seized upon ECL for the Lisp, since I could easily make an
interface to the library, and I had a notion at CommonQt might be a
good way to do the UI. Of course, I can put lots of U
