Re: [Ecls-list] Is ECL really ANSI compatible ?

2012-09-28 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:13 AM, z_axis wrote: > The ECL created stumpwm executable is smallest compared with SBCL, CCL and > CLISP. However, only the ECL executable doesnot work. > I really want to know what the reason is. > Stumpwm did work with ECL not so long ago. Why it got rotten and no l

Re: [Ecls-list] Is ECL really ANSI compatible ?

2012-09-27 Thread Anton Vodonosov
ECL is ANSI compatible. ASDF not created? How's that? If you post the output here, we will be able to understand what is the error. 28.09.2012, 04:13, "z_axis" : > The ECL created stumpwm executable is smallest compared with SBCL, CCL and > CLISP.  However, only the ECL executable doesnot work. >

[Ecls-list] Is ECL really ANSI compatible ?

2012-09-27 Thread z_axis
The ECL created stumpwm executable is smallest compared with SBCL, CCL and CLISP. However, only the ECL executable doesnot work. I really want to know what the reason is. On my freebsd box, i add `exec truss -o /home/***/err.txt /home/***/bin/stumpwm` in ~/.xinitrc, but i got nothing from the