Re: [Ecls-list] building against system provided libatomic-ops

2011-02-26 Thread Christoph Egger
Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com writes: On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org wrote:    It seems 11.1.1 lost the ability to build against the system provided libatomic-ops (10.3.1 did build against it just fine). Is there

Re: [Ecls-list] building against system provided libatomic-ops

2011-02-26 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Christoph Egger christ...@debian.orgwrote: It *seems* the resulting binaries do not use that internally built lib -- bot why is it still build? Because it is my intention to export the CAS and other atomic operations. Does the current build fail on your system

Re: [Ecls-list] building against system provided libatomic-ops

2011-02-21 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Christoph Egger christ...@debian.orgwrote: It seems 11.1.1 lost the ability to build against the system provided libatomic-ops (10.3.1 did build against it just fine). Is there a reason for this regression? or a fix? When making such a statement, some

[Ecls-list] building against system provided libatomic-ops

2011-02-20 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! It seems 11.1.1 lost the ability to build against the system provided libatomic-ops (10.3.1 did build against it just fine). Is there a reason for this regression? or a fix? Regards Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker |