Re: [Ecls-list] Help needed, really

2011-01-03 Thread Samium Gromoff
I am replying to several mails, by different authors here, sorry for that. On Sat, 01 Jan 2011 13:13:36 -0600, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > At the moment, since the discussion is stall and it does not appear that > ECL is willing to make itself more useful (at least as far as OpenAxiom > is concerne

Re: [Ecls-list] Help needed, really

2011-01-03 Thread Konovalov, Vadim (Vadim)** CTR **
> From: Samium Gromoff [mailto:_deepf...@feelingofgreen.ru] > elsewhere, Juan-Jose Garcia Ripoll wrote: > > * You, Gabriel, insist on the need to provide information > to users, but give > > no precise names nor do you explain how I should offer this > > information. > > Well, he does, with a /

[Ecls-list] OpenAxiom and detecting ECL's ABI

2011-01-03 Thread dherring
Hi all, Wow. I guess I'm glad I didn't check my email until lunch at work today. FWIW, I use both projects at home. I skimmed the other thread, and my reply will be brief. Getting compatible CFLAGS and LDFLAGS is a hard problem, and it comes up regularly. A few approaches are common in this s

Re: [Ecls-list] OpenAxiom and detecting ECL's ABI

2011-01-03 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:13 PM, wrote: > That was less brief than I intended... > Thanks for the text. It was clear as water and perfectly summarizes the existing approaches to this problem. Juanjo -- Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://juanjose

Re: [Ecls-list] Help needed, really

2011-01-03 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Samium Gromoff <_deepf...@feelingofgreen.ru>wrote: > My impression was that ECL doesn't /add/ information anywhere -- it merely > /forwards/ whatever is fed to it by autoconf. It's not intent, merely a > lack of sophistication. Juan, am I right? [...] > In other wo

[Ecls-list] Problems with #= and #./#+/#-/user macro

2011-01-03 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
The specification of #= seems to be ill defined with respect to its interaction with reader macros. Take this: #1=(1 2 3 #.(print '#1#)) it crashes SBCL and produces garbage in ECL. Similar problems about the interaction between #+ and #= (1 2 #+#1=(:ecl) 3 #+#1# 4) or the interaction with #.

Re: [Ecls-list] Problems with #= and #./#+/#-/user macro

2011-01-03 Thread David Brown
On Mon, Jan 03 2011, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > The specification of #= seems to be ill defined with respect to its > interaction > with reader macros. Take this: > >  #1=(1 2 3 #.(print '#1#)) > > it crashes SBCL and produces garbage in ECL. Similar problems about the It doesn't seem to c