Re: [Ecls-list] Release candidate for ECL 12.2.1
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Marko Kocić marko.ko...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Juan, In order to try windows build without installing older gcc, I tried to build it using clang. It built C code fine, but failed in linking phase. I opened a bug at https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3482358group_id=30035atid=398053 It seems that gcc and clang on windows use different naming convention for exported symbols (leading underscores or not) on windows. I don't have an idea if fixing clang/windows build would be simple enough to take it into the release? Apparently the problem is LLVM's. It is a bug in their compiler, which does not produce the right link flags for symbols with declspec(dllexport) See http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.bugs/4614 Can I close the bug report? Juanjo -- Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com -- Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d___ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
Re: [Ecls-list] Release candidate for ECL 12.2.1
Would this work? TAGS: if test x$(ETAGS) != x; then \ srcfiles=`find $(srcdir)/c $(srcdir)/h -name '*.[chd]'` \ $(ETAGS) --language=c-o $@ $$srcfiles \ $(ETAGS) --language=none -o $@ --append \ --regex='/@\([-:*a-zA-z]+\)/\1/' \ --regex='/@(defun \([-:*a-zA-z]+\)/\1/' \ $$srcfiles; \ fi touch $@ I did not see this bug in Ubuntu. Maybe it uses a different etags... Juanjo -- Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com -- Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d___ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
Re: [Ecls-list] building maxima
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Paul Bowyer pbow...@olynet.com wrote: I ran into another file that won't compile with ECL 11.1.1 as I've been trying to build maxima. I've attached the file for your inspection because after looking it over, I don't see the problem. It looks like the compiler is complaining about (CCV 0.0) is not a legal function name, when in fact (CCV is a variable with an init-form for initialization. I'm still learning to work with common lisp, so I may be incorrect here. FWIW, I can confirm this. The lisp code is valid; I don't know why ecl fails on this. I spent a few seconds trying to come up with a simpler test case, but failed. Ray -- Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d___ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
Re: [Ecls-list] Release candidate for ECL 12.2.1
This bug you linked is reported for llvm-gcc, not clang, but I guess they share the same issue. You can close the bug report. Thanks, Marko On Feb 1, 2012 10:41 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Marko Kocić marko.ko...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Juan, In order to try windows build without installing older gcc, I tried to build it using clang. It built C code fine, but failed in linking phase. I opened a bug at https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3482358group_id=30035atid=398053 It seems that gcc and clang on windows use different naming convention for exported symbols (leading underscores or not) on windows. I don't have an idea if fixing clang/windows build would be simple enough to take it into the release? Apparently the problem is LLVM's. It is a bug in their compiler, which does not produce the right link flags for symbols with declspec(dllexport) See http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.bugs/4614 Can I close the bug report? Juanjo -- Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com -- Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d___ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
