Re: [Ecls-list] Revisiting locks and signals

2010-10-25 Thread Matthew Mondor
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 22:09:14 +0200 Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: Since threads are not a standard part of CL, I'm rather confused about what should be expected of implementations. POSIX threads are standard however, and I have fair experience with them (I'll ask various questions relatively to

Re: [Ecls-list] Revisiting locks and signals

2010-10-25 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:54 AM, Daniel Herring wrote: > New APIs like signalfd are moving away from the random-interrupt model of > signals towards a more I/O friendly model. See e.g. > http://lwn.net/Articles/225714/ > This is interesting, but as I said it is one of two possible views: request

Re: [Ecls-list] Revisiting locks and signals

2010-10-25 Thread dherring
Two projects I couldn't remember earlier: http://github.com/dgoncharov/libunixsignal http://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/ > On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:54:33 -0400 (EDT) > Daniel Herring wrote: > >> New APIs like signalfd are moving away from the random-interrupt model >> of >> signals towards a more I/O