I have the following for my .eclrc:
(require 'asdf)
(pushnew #P"/Users/daviddreisigmeyer/.emacs.d/site-lisp/slime/"
asdf:*central-registry* :test #'equal)
(push "/Users/daviddreisigmeyer/.emacs.d/site-lisp/slime/"
asdf:*central-registry*)
(asdf:oos 'asdf:load-op 'swank)
(setf s
Why not check what information is put in *features* by other
implementations? If OpenAxiom runs on them, then that should be enough.
Keywords like :X86 and :X86-64 seem common, and this should be easy to
figure out when building ECL. :ILP32 or :LP64 might be even more
informative than that
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:42:43 +0100
Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
Sorry that I didn't read the previous discussions, which most probably
happened on another list (and it's unclear to me why OpenAxiom requires
that implementation-dependent low-level information; why it cannot use
an FFI library or
I have no preconceived idea about your problem, however, I will note
that:
Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
writes:
> Since ECL does not really care about the processor type, it is fine
> with it, and just works: it only relies on information provided by the
> compiler, such as type sizes, alignments, a
I am having a now too long discussion about things that ECL should or should
not do and I really need help, someone that translates or helps me
understand this because we are not getting anywhere.
The original problem was that OpenAxiom was not building right in OS X
because it expects ECL to expo
