Re: [Ecls-list] Release ready
Hi Juan, I can confirm that libffi on mingw now works fine after moving it to CORE_LIBS. I have yet to confirm that this also fixes Gentoo build. Also, requiring asdf problem similar to one Stas reported dissapeared. As a side note, I was able to quickload lispbuilder-sdl on mingw using Ecl for the first time, and can confirm that, at list on the first glance, it works. It is goot to have CL impl that allows me to run slime and gui application in parallel on windows. I also quickloaded hunchentoot web server successfully (for the first time with ecl). Unfortunatelly, it doesn't seem to work. Those two libraries depends on quite a lot of other libraries, so it is a good sign that those are compilable with ECL. Thanks for the best release ever, hope the next one will be even better :) Regards, Marko Kocić -- Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you can protect your company and customers by using code signing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
Re: [Ecls-list] Release ready
This links might be interesting: http://www.metabang.com/unclog/otherpag/asdfinst.html http://bc.tech.coop/blog/051012.html http://bc.tech.coop/blog/060108.html They describe dependencies between libraries, alhout those are a bit out of date, but it clearly identifies key libraries used by everyone. Something like that which include all quicklisp world libraries would be interesting. As for the goal for the next release to ensure better library support for ECL, I fully agree with it. It can be really frustrating for the beginner or casual user if he tries to load library that works in SBCL only to find out that it doesn't even compile in ECL. Regards, Marko Kocić On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Marko Kocić marko.ko...@gmail.com wrote: Unfortunatelly, it doesn't seem to work. Those two libraries depends on quite a lot of other libraries, so it is a good sign that those are compilable with ECL. Hi Marko, thanks a lot for the detailed report. My goal for the next release is indeed enlarge the number of libraries that are tested using the facilities provided by quicklisp. You have mentioned a couple of them, but maybe it would be better first to examine the most common dependencies of those libraries (cl-unicode, for instance, is one, cl-ppcre, etc, etc). Some of those still have incompatibilities or may reveal problems in ECL. Juanjo -- Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com -- Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you can protect your company and customers by using code signing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
Re: [Ecls-list] Release ready
Stas Boukarev stass...@gmail.com writes:
Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com writes:
Hi everybody,
Regarding Stas Boukarev's problems with require-ing ASDF and compiling a
test file that defines the ASDF package, I could not reproduce it in any
system with a clean new copy of ECL.
This is quite unfortunate, because this really is a show-stopper here, I
can't load any .fas which weren't compiled in the current instance of
ECL.
Here is my further analyses:
Consider the function
ecl_make_package
http://ecls.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=ecls/ecl;a=blob;f=src/c/package.d;h=5939239084d30db5d484ce3ff8924a3ee64ef004;hb=HEAD#l195
which is eventually called when loading the code I showed earlier.
It calls
x = find_pending_package(env, name, nicknames);
which returns a package, because it finds it in env-packages_to_be_created
(which, I
presume, is set up by LOAD), so that means that if (Null(x)) { ... } is
not executed, and the variable `other' isn't set to anything.
Next, it iterates over nicknames, which it has none, and `other' is still
untouched.
And finally, it does
if (!Null(other))
but the variable `other' wasn't ever initialized, and when I insert a print
statement there, it shows #illegal pointer bf9c2d38, which isn't null,
and it's eventually passed to CEpackage_error, which then
complains not a lisp data object.
And the patch which fixes the problem for me.
diff --git a/src/c/package.d b/src/c/package.d
index 5939239..88d5957 100644
--- a/src/c/package.d
+++ b/src/c/package.d
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ cl_object
ecl_make_package(cl_object name, cl_object nicknames, cl_object use_list)
{
const cl_env_ptr env = ecl_process_env();
- cl_object x, l, other;
+ cl_object x, l, other = Cnil;
/* Type checking, coercions, and the like, happen before we
* acquire the lock */
--
With Best Regards, Stas.
--
Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks
Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand
malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you
can protect your company and customers by using code signing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl___
Ecls-list mailing list
Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
Re: [Ecls-list] Release ready
Thanks for identifying the problem. It seems that the uninitialized variable was only detected by gcc 4.5, while all other compilers I used (4.4. 4.0, 3.something) ignored that. I already uploaded the fix. Juanjo -- Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com -- Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you can protect your company and customers by using code signing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl___ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
Re: [Ecls-list] Release ready
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:16:23 +0100 Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com wrote: The patch for etags and the fix for the Makefile were committed today. Some changes were needed to make it work on other makes I confirm these fixed it for me. Thanks! -- Matt -- Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you can protect your company and customers by using code signing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
Re: [Ecls-list] Release ready
Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com writes: I had to fix a number of bugs that were submitted during the last days. Unless somebody complains very loud (please, no! :-) I will tag and upload the 11.1.1 release this weekend. When doing (require 'asdf) I get ;;; Loading #P/usr/local/lib/ecl-11.1.1/asdf.fas Internal or unrecoverable error in: not a lisp data object [2: No such file or directory] ;;; ECL C Backtrace ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(si_dump_c_backtrace+0x2f) [0xb77de577] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(ecl_internal_error+0x8c) [0xb77d180d] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(cl_class_of+0x216) [0xb77bcc4e] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(+0xa78d6) [0xb77528d6] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(APPLY_fixed+0x6a) [0xb78177eb] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(ecl_apply_from_stack_frame+0xc6) [0xb77afed0] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(cl_funcall+0xc5) [0xb77b01bb] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(+0x113156) [0xb77be156] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(_ecl_standard_dispatch+0x240) [0xb77be403] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(ecl_apply_from_stack_frame+0x12d) [0xb77aff37] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(cl_apply+0x1f4) [0xb77b03bd] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(+0xb42e1) [0xb775f2e1] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(APPLY+0x1b3) [0xb780dc43] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(ecl_apply_from_stack_frame+0xe4) [0xb77afeee] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(cl_apply+0x8d) [0xb77b0256] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(+0xadfd2) [0xb7758fd2] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(+0xae178) [0xb7759178] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(APPLY+0x79) [0xb780db09] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(ecl_apply_from_stack_frame+0x102) [0xb77aff0c] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(cl_funcall+0xc5) [0xb77b01bb] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(_ecl_standard_dispatch+0x285) [0xb77be448] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(ecl_apply_from_stack_frame+0x12d) [0xb77aff37] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(cl_apply+0x1f4) [0xb77b03bd] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(+0xe1c25) [0xb778cc25] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(APPLY+0x1b3) [0xb780dc43] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(ecl_apply_from_stack_frame+0xe4) [0xb77afeee] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(cl_apply+0x1f4) [0xb77b03bd] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(+0xe23bc) [0xb778d3bc] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(+0xe47b3) [0xb778f7b3] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(APPLY_fixed+0x92) [0xb7817813] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(ecl_apply_from_stack_frame+0xc6) [0xb77afed0] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(cl_funcall+0xc5) [0xb77b01bb] -- With Best Regards, Stas. -- Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you can protect your company and customers by using code signing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
Re: [Ecls-list] Release ready
Configuration flags? Platform? Sent from my iPod On Jan 15, 2011, at 10:42 AM, Stas Boukarev stass...@gmail.com wrote: Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com writes: I had to fix a number of bugs that were submitted during the last days. Unless somebody complains very loud (please, no! :-) I will tag and upload the 11.1.1 release this weekend. When doing (require 'asdf) I get ;;; Loading #P/usr/local/lib/ecl-11.1.1/asdf.fas Internal or unrecoverable error in: not a lisp data object [2: No such file or directory] ;;; ECL C Backtrace ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(si_dump_c_backtrace+0x2f) [0xb77de577] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(ecl_internal_error+0x8c) [0xb77d180d] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(cl_class_of+0x216) [0xb77bcc4e] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(+0xa78d6) [0xb77528d6] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(APPLY_fixed+0x6a) [0xb78177eb] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(ecl_apply_from_stack_frame+0xc6) [0xb77afed0] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(cl_funcall+0xc5) [0xb77b01bb] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(+0x113156) [0xb77be156] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(_ecl_standard_dispatch+0x240) [0xb77be403] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(ecl_apply_from_stack_frame+0x12d) [0xb77aff37] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(cl_apply+0x1f4) [0xb77b03bd] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(+0xb42e1) [0xb775f2e1] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(APPLY+0x1b3) [0xb780dc43] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(ecl_apply_from_stack_frame+0xe4) [0xb77afeee] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(cl_apply+0x8d) [0xb77b0256] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(+0xadfd2) [0xb7758fd2] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(+0xae178) [0xb7759178] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(APPLY+0x79) [0xb780db09] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(ecl_apply_from_stack_frame+0x102) [0xb77aff0c] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(cl_funcall+0xc5) [0xb77b01bb] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(_ecl_standard_dispatch+0x285) [0xb77be448] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(ecl_apply_from_stack_frame+0x12d) [0xb77aff37] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(cl_apply+0x1f4) [0xb77b03bd] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(+0xe1c25) [0xb778cc25] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(APPLY+0x1b3) [0xb780dc43] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(ecl_apply_from_stack_frame+0xe4) [0xb77afeee] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(cl_apply+0x1f4) [0xb77b03bd] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(+0xe23bc) [0xb778d3bc] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(+0xe47b3) [0xb778f7b3] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(APPLY_fixed+0x92) [0xb7817813] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(ecl_apply_from_stack_frame+0xc6) [0xb77afed0] ;;; /usr/local/lib/libecl.so.11.1(cl_funcall+0xc5) [0xb77b01bb] -- With Best Regards, Stas. -- Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you can protect your company and customers by using code signing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
Re: [Ecls-list] Release ready
Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com writes: Configuration flags? Platform? Interestingly, the following succeeds: (make-package ASDF) #ASDF package (require 'asdf) ;;; Loading #P/usr/local/lib/ecl-11.1.1/asdf.fas ;;; Loading #P/usr/local/lib/ecl-11.1.1/cmp.fas (ASDF CMP) -- With Best Regards, Stas. -- Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you can protect your company and customers by using code signing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
Re: [Ecls-list] Release ready
Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com writes: Configuration flags? Platform? Digging further: Given file ;;; (eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute) (unless (find-package :asdf) (make-package :asdf :use '(:cl (in-package :asdf) (print 'foo) ;;; Start fresh ecl: (compile-file foo.lisp) Exit ecl, start it again: (load foo.fas) = crash I guess it has to do with discrepancies between compile-time and load-time packages, and interning FOO causes problems. -- With Best Regards, Stas. -- Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you can protect your company and customers by using code signing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
