In Response to Mr Welker;
I would strongly suspect that a person who disapproves of the "precautionary
principle" would be a man of action, a man of his word..which is why we
should expect you to be the person who volunteers to take untested
pharmaceuticals before they have undergone the F
Regarding Mr Cherubini's contrarian comments regarding basic science and the
lack of obvious economic benefit to society, we should always recall the
Japanese physicist who, at the outset of WWII, had all his funding cut off
because he was working on the "ridiculous" subject matter of nuclear ph
re good, then 4 must be better". I think what Relyea's study is
trying to tell us is that we should employ the precautionary principle here,
due to the fact that the history of pesticide toxicology hell has long been
paved with good intentions.
Chris Rosamond
> Date: Fri, 3
