Another problem with the review process is that often a reviewer or
associate editor will be considered sufficient authority to provide
objective and accurate comments on a manuscript, yet often this is not
the case. They may be much less familiar with the material and its
larger context
Dear David,
To write a critic to paper is what we did in:
D. Alonso and M. Pascual (2006). A keystone mutualism drives pattern in a
power function. Technical Comment. *Science, 313*: 1739b
J. Chave, D. Alonso and R. S. Etienne (2006). Comparing models of species
abundance. *Nature, 441*: E1-E2*.
that is demonstrably of
concern to researchers in ecology. Perhaps I should have submitted them
anonymously?
WT
- Original Message -
From: William Silvert cien...@silvert.org
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 2:18 PM
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous
...@ucdavis.edu
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
Wow, I clearly hit on a painful topic here! I've been getting asked
on-list and off- to clarify, a bit, why I might want to do what my
original question
Março de 2010 23:00
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
As an editor of a journal I have been surprised to find only a single time
in five years that a review was possibly unfair,
and that one was unfairly positive. It has been refreshing to find that
most people review manuscripts
david alonso vankampe...@gmail.com wrote:
stuff cut
So as a reviewer, if you want to publish your own review reports
once the original paper has been published, since, as Hal said,
the reviews are copy-right materials by their own authors by default, you
should be allowed to do it.
: iweb.tntech.edu/cabrown
-Original Message-
From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news
[mailto:ecolo...@listserv.umd.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan Greenberg
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 12:48 PM
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
Quick question
01, 2010 12:48 PM
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
Quick question that came up recently that I was curious about -- I know
REVIEWERS are anonymous, but are the reviews you get supposed to be
anonymous, or can they be posted in a public forum?
--j
Gilmore
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Greenberg greenb...@ucdavis.edu
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 10:48 AM
Subject: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
Quick question that came up recently that I was curious about -- I
know REVIEWERS are anonymous
-bremen.de
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:44:59
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
Dear All,
I agree completely with Kevin that reviewers should sign their review.
That's what I started to do and I will not make any reviews for journals
that insist
-
From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news
[mailto:ecolo...@listserv.umd.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan Greenberg
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 12:48 PM
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
Quick question that came up recently that I was curious
Annapolis, MD 21401
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:12:57 -0500
From: hcasw...@whoi.edu
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Surprisingly enough, those reviews are copyrighted by their authors,
automatically, even though the authors are anonymous. So
: grants, jobs, news
[mailto:ecolo...@listserv.umd.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan Greenberg
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 12:48 PM
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
Quick question that came up recently that I was curious about -- I know
REVIEWERS are anonymous
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
Quick question that came up recently that I was curious about -- I know
REVIEWERS are anonymous, but are the reviews you get supposed to be
anonymous, or can they be posted in a public forum?
--j
: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Surprisingly enough, those reviews are copyrighted by their authors,
automatically, even though the authors are anonymous. So, you can't
publish them. You could assign them to a class in the same way you
could assign other copyrighted
From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news
[ecolo...@listserv.umd.edu] On Behalf Of James Crants [jcra...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 3 March 2010 5:39 a.m.
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
On the other hand, if the reviewers
.
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
On the other hand, if the reviewers are anonymous, the authors should be,
too. I think transparency is a bad thing, in this case; I think reviews
should be double-blind.
While reviewer anonymity allows reviewers
original data, and novel interpretations are not
good science. I reserve the right to protest.
Bill Silvert
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Greenberg greenb...@ucdavis.edu
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Sent: segunda-feira, 1 de Março de 2010 23:09
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews
...@ucdavis.edu
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Sent: terça-feira, 2 de Março de 2010 21:40
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
I want to clarify a point: I don't mean that a bad review is one in
which your paper is rejected, a bad review I define a bad review as
one that does little
: Christopher Brown cabr...@tntech.edu
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Sent: segunda-feira, 1 de Março de 2010 22:16
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
Jonathan,
As it so happens, a message close to yours in my email folder was from a
review I did for American Naturalist. As part of the message
www.unr.nevada.edu/~dochterm/
--
-Original Message-
From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news
[mailto:ecolo...@listserv.umd.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan Greenberg
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 1:40 PM
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
Wow, I clearly
2010 5:39 a.m.
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
On the other hand, if the reviewers are anonymous, the authors should be,
too. I think transparency is a bad thing, in this case; I think reviews
should be double-blind.
While reviewer anonymity
Silvert
- Original Message -
From: Murray Efford murray.eff...@otago.ac.nz
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Sent: terça-feira, 2 de Março de 2010 20:02
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
James Crants has it right. I recently wrote a harsh review of a poor paper
by a high-profile
in England, Take Courage!
WT
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Greenberg greenb...@ucdavis.edu
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
Wow, I clearly hit on a painful topic here! I've been getting asked
Quick question that came up recently that I was curious about -- I
know REVIEWERS are anonymous, but are the reviews you get supposed to
be anonymous, or can they be posted in a public forum?
--j
of America: grants, jobs, news
[mailto:ecolo...@listserv.umd.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan Greenberg
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 12:48 PM
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
Quick question that came up recently that I was curious about -- I know
REVIEWERS
-Original Message-
From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news
[mailto:ecolo...@listserv.umd.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan Greenberg
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 12:48 PM
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
Quick question that came up recently
: grants, jobs, news
[mailto:ecolo...@listserv.umd.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan Greenberg
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 12:48 PM
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
Quick question that came up recently that I was curious about -- I know
REVIEWERS
...@listserv.umd.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan Greenberg
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 12:48 PM
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: [ECOLOG-L] Are reviews anonymous?
Quick question that came up recently that I was curious about -- I
know
REVIEWERS are anonymous, but are the reviews you get supposed
29 matches
Mail list logo
