Re: [ECOLOG-L] Ecology as Science Status and Future

2009-12-29 Thread songliang wang
that? in this regard, ecology should have a glary future. Songliang Wang Ph.D.,Prof. College of Crop Sciences Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University Fuzhou 350002, P. R. China www.wsolo-agroecology.org Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:16:00 -0800 From: landr...@cox.net Subject: [ECOLOG-L] Ecology

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Ecology as Science Status and Future

2009-12-28 Thread malcolm McCallum
Sure it would. Everything would be static and no change would occur. After all, those Dinosaurs were planted by Satan to trick us all. On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Jane Shevtsov jane@gmail.com wrote: Can you elaborate? While there are certainly some examples of cases where evolution is

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Ecology as Science Status and Future

2009-12-28 Thread David M. Lawrence
You've thus undermined your argument for ignoring evolution as a part of ecology. I can think of plenty of areas of ecology -- pollination and seed dispersal, for instance -- where evolutionary ideas are key components of their theoretical foundation. There is also a key historical fact

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Ecology as Science Status and Future

2009-12-28 Thread Stephen Alan Lohse
- From: William Silvert cien...@silvert.org Date: Monday, December 28, 2009 3:51 am Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Ecology as Science Status and Future To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU Since we seem to be celebrating the New Year with a philosophical twist, I have a question to pose -- why do we focus

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Ecology as Science Status and Future

2009-12-28 Thread William Silvert
: Jane Shevtsov jane@gmail.com To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU Sent: segunda-feira, 28 de Dezembro de 2009 16:29 Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Ecology as Science Status and Future BTW, Bill, most creationists don't deny that selection (natural or artificial) occurs. What they deny is speciation

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Ecology as Science Status and Future

2009-12-28 Thread Robert Hamilton
IMHO, succession stands still as the one thing that we can take as solid theory in ecology. Since Clements, there has been a lot of re inventing of the wheel, however nonetheless we still can and do observe succession and it stands as the basic point of reference for most ecology. Theories on

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Ecology as Science Status and Future

2009-12-27 Thread Jane Shevtsov
Can you elaborate? While there are certainly some examples of cases where evolution is important in ecology, it seems to me that if the creationists turned out to be right, most of ecology would remain the same. If I had to pick a short basis of ecology, it would consist of two facts. 1.

[ECOLOG-L] Ecology as Science Status and Future

2009-12-26 Thread Wayne Tyson
Honorable Ecolog Forum: There's something about the imminent end of still another year that gets me to thinking about where things are, where they have been, and where they are going. It's a time for reflection that's as good as any, but a life well-lived is in a continuous state of