little of ExpectMORE as it has ignored the program
and cut few of the programs with low evaluations.
David Duffy
- Original Message -
From: Lyndell Bade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, June 23, 2008 7:49 pm
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] ineffective federal programs?
To: ECOLOG-L
George; thanks for the link! I am enjoying reading the further links on the
expectmore.gov website, the ones that explain why the program in question is
deemed 'ineffective.' In some cases, the methods used to gather data are
incomplete or biased, a plan does not exist to effectively
*How can a program merely meant to provide funding and daily
operations support for military bases be not-performing?*
This is easy...
Is the program providing unlimited financial support?
Also, lets face it, the fact that our military has performed numerous
shady deals during this administration
A I browsed the NASA site (thanks to Jim Hansen), I ran across a puzzling link
at the bottom of the page: ExpectMORE.gov
(http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/expectmore/index.html).
My curiosity piqued, I looked further and was informed that the FWS Endangered
Species Program and the Migratory
I'm more than puzzled. I'm dumbfounded. If you merely browse through the
not-performing federal programs, the list is staggering. The programs
listed can not possibly be not-performing.
*Even the most straightforward forestry, conservation, education, social
services, housing, agricultural,
