Re: [ECOLOG-L] Climate Change Data

2011-03-21 Thread Taylor, Cm
Mike,

I appreciate your situation, but the fact is that for every person like you 
there are many others who have little to no science background, routinely ship 
and receive animals and plants illegally, and decimate vulnerable populations 
of organisms, among other things as I am sure you are aware. I don't think it 
is fair to blame the science community for these problems.  Again, I am sorry 
for any impact to your legitimate business, but surely you can understand these 
issues and see how they arise.

Chris

*
Dr. Christopher Taylor
Professor, Aquatic Ecology
Department of Natural Resources Management
Texas Tech University
Box 42125
Lubbock, TX  79049



-Original Message-
From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news 
[mailto:ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU] On Behalf Of Michael E. Welker
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011 10:17 PM
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Climate Change Data

Warren and forum,

Facts and data should rule not abuse of the precautionary principle. Far to 
often wildlife and environmental extremists (even those in academia or from 
academia) have abused the precautionary principle. An example would be the use 
of taking the worse case scenario say for a turtle species age to sexual 
maturity. By using the oldest age known rather then the average or the most 
common to push an agenda. This was done in the FL turtle banning agenda by a 
well known turtle biologist. Take for instance the management of herpetofauna 
in TX, rather then enacting fair regulations and sustainable harvest management 
approaches, activities were banned causing private herpers to have to liquidate 
collections that have taken decades to build. And destroying businesses and 
breeding programs that contribute to herp conservation through captive 
propagation of herp species. The precautionary principle is used by agenda 
pushing academics to scare regulatory biologists (who come from academia!
 ) because many of the these experts are anti-wild collection and 
anti-commercialization. They are preservationists not conservationists. And 
they look at themselves as animal advocates. They are also exempt, as are zoos 
and museums, from complying to the regulations so it doesn't affect them. 
Further many use the precautionary principle and the banning agenda to secure 
grant funding for continued research. An example of this would be the Burmese 
python problem in the Everglades and the climate model paper. The more famous a 
researcher becomes the more grant money they get, the bigger labs they have and 
the higher fees they can charge for consultations and projects. An example of 
that would be a well known conservation biologist in FL. I have the facts. I 
just don't want to throw out names because that wouldn't be appropriate. I say 
stick to facts and data and not abuse the precautionary principle.

Mike Welker
El Paso, TX


  - Original Message -
  From: Warren W. Aney
  To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
  Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011 6:07 PM
  Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Climate Change Data


  In the face of uncertainty with potential consequences of great magnitude,
  the precautionary approach should rule.  Under this approach it is safer and
  more prudent to take effective action to counter climate change than it is
  to take no action and risk its effects.  The costs of taking action are
  high, but there are also benefits (cleaner air and healthier oceans, for
  example).  The costs of not taking action are potentially catastrophic.

  Our ancestors will enjoy an improved world and thank us for taking action
  even if they determine we were wrong. Our surviving ancestors will condemn
  us if we took no action and this proved to be wrong.

  I know, this is rhetoric and not science, but I have frequently had to deal
  with decision making in the face of scientific uncertainty and this is the
  approach I finally learned to apply or recommend.

  Warren W. Aney
  Senior Wildlife Ecologist
  Tigard, OR 97223

  -Original Message-
  From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news
  [mailto:ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU] On Behalf Of Hal Caswell
  Sent: Sunday, 20 March, 2011 15:12
  To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
  Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Climate Change Data

  Wayne,

  Whether it's a trick question or not depends, of course, on the details.
  However, if you really want information about the direct and indirect
  effects of anthropogenic causes of climate change you could not do better
  than to start with the 4th IPCC  report. This is freely available to anyone
  with internet access at

  http://www.ipcc.ch/

  It represents the output of the largest scientific collaboration in history.
  Each volume is prefaced by a summary for policy-makers which is purposely
  designed to be accessible to non-specialists.  Most policy-makers are not,
  after all, scientists.

  As you know, one of the essential aspects of any scientific 

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Hypothesis Testing in Ecology

2011-03-01 Thread Taylor, Cm
Most of studies in ecology are observational not experimental.

Perhaps, perhaps not.  Depends on who you ask.  The point is really moot - if 
your system is amenable to manipulation, a proper experiment is invaluable.  
Most field ecologists are dealing with systems that are not easily manupulated. 
 Does this mean they can't do good science, because they are dealing with many 
intercorrelated gradients that complicate matters?  I think not.  As Nick 
Gotelli once told me when I was an impressionable PhD student, Galileo never 
moved a star.  Kind of sums it up.
 
Imagine testing the hypothesis of past competition on Darwin finches under the 
H-D method. 
 
Not sure what H-D is, may have missed it, but regarding Darwin's finches, I 
think what you are saying is that an experiment can't be conducted that will 
answer the question of competition past.  True, but an accumulation of evidence 
from a variety of studies spanning behavioral ecology to phylogenetics gives us 
a pretty strong theory concerning their evolutionary ecology.  Of course, 
something to the contrary could conceivably come up that might make biologists 
reconsider things.   But it ain't happened yet.  Pretty  strong science I 
think.  However, you might say, but the competition past question still 
stands... True, science does not provide time machines.  I think you might  be 
getting a little hung up on Popper and the role of statistics.  Conceptually, I 
have no problem with Popper, but it's a very narrow view.  Stats are useful, 
but they are just a means to an end and can be easily misused.  Likwise, it's 
important to not confuse the stats with the underlying question!
 , which is often much more complex than a p-value.

Chris

**
Dr. Christopher Taylor
Professor, Aquatic Ecology
Department of Natural Resources Management
Texas Tech University
Lubbock, TX  79409

From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news 
[ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU] On Behalf Of Manuel Spínola [mspinol...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 8:49 PM
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Hypothesis Testing in Ecology

Hi Martin,

If you state a scientific hypothesis you need to derive predictions from
it, and sometimes you can state the predictions as statistical
hypotheses, but not always, in fact, Karl Popper was not thinking on
statistics or statistical hypotheses.

As Malcolm McCallum said if you use statistics to test a scientific
hypothesis I think you are in a more shaking ground, statistics has its
own problems. By the way, statistics is inductive.

Some people are using information theoretic approaches like AIC (Akaike
Information Criterion) to work with what they believe are scientific
hypothesis but I don't think so.  They have a set of models but not
necessarily a set of scientific hypotheses.  Other problems of working
with hypothesis in ecology are the multicausality of ecological
phenomena and the limitation of conducting experiments at some spatial
and time scales.  Most of studies in ecology are observational not
experimental.

More on Popper.  Karl Popper did not believe that the theory of
evolution by natural selection was a scientific theory.   He argument
that you cannot falsify an hypothesis derived from that theory.   How do you 
falsify that hypothesis using a critical
experiment as the H-D followers call it?

Best,

Manuel



On 28/02/2011 05:16 p.m., Martin Meiss wrote:
I'm not sure I understand Manuel's distinction between statistical
 hypootheses and scientific hypothesis.  Is not the former supposed in some
 way to mathematically embody/parameterize the latter?
 But in any case, it seems to me that it is often hard to rigorously
 formulate a null hypothesis and a corresponding working hypothesis.  Suppose
 you hear an account where someone had a feeling of foreboding about his
 mother, only to discover later that just when he was having that feeling,
 his mother, thousands of miles away, had suddenly died.  When people tell
 stories like this, it's often followed with a challenge, like you can't
 tell me that's just a coincidence!
 Well, I'd like to say it is a coincidence, but how could you test
 it?  What is the expected number of times you should have a feeling of
 foreboding about your mother and she DOESN'T die?  What is the expected
 number of times mothers should die without their sons/daughters having
 feelings of foreboding?  How close to the actual time of death does the
 feeling of foreboding have to be before we can count it?  How creepy does a
 feeling have to be before it reaches the threshold of genuine foreboding?
 Now, this doesn't sound very ecological, but I'll bet readers of this
 listserv can come up with examples from biology that approach this level of
 nebulosity.  Here's my stab at it: How K-selected must an organism be before
 we say it is K-selected (or r-selected).  How 

[ECOLOG-L] Coop Unit position in Aquatic Ecology at Texas Tech

2010-02-01 Thread Taylor, Cm
Dear Colleagues,

The US Geological Survey invites qualified applicants for the position of 
Assistant Unit Leader at the Texas Cooperative Fish  Wildlife Unit. The 
general field of expertise for this position is applied Aquatic 
Ecology/Biology. This is a federal government position and US citizenship is 
required. The incumbent will hold a faculty appointment at Texas Tech 
University and will be responsible for teaching, research and other duties as 
listed on the complete job description at the USA Jobs website, 
http://www.USAJobs.gov; position number is CR-2010-0121.

Applications will be accepted until Wednesday, March 3, 2010.

Please forward to others as you see fit. Interested candidates are encouraged 
to contact Dr. Reynaldo Patino of the Texas Cooperative Fish  Wildlife Unit at 
his e-mail address or telephone number below.  Thank you.


Reynaldo Patiño

Unit Leader and Professor
USGS Texas Cooperative Fish  Wildlife Research Unit
Texas Tech University
Agricultural Sciences, Rm 218
15th and Boston
Lubbock, TX 79409-2120

(806) 742-2851, extension 261 (voice)
(806) 742-2946 (fax)
reynaldo.pat...@ttu.edumailto:reynaldo.pat...@ttu.edu
http://www.tcfwru.ttu.edu/default.aspx

*
Dr. Christopher Taylor
Department of Natural Resources Management
Texas Tech University
Box 42125
Lubbock, TX  79049


[ECOLOG-L] Hanna Multiparameter water quality meters

2009-02-13 Thread Taylor, Cm
Hello,

Has anyone had any experience with the Hanna multiparameter meters?  I'm 
particularly interested in how they compare with the YSI meters regarding ease 
of use and setup, ability to bounce off rocks, get wet, etc.

Thanks,
Chris


***
Dr. Christopher M. Taylor
Dept. of Natural Resources Management
Mail stop 2125
Texas Tech University
Lubbock, TX  79409
Phone: 806-742-1983
Fax: 806-742-2280
P Before printing this e-mail ask if it is absolutely necessary



Fisheries/Aquatic Biologist position at Texas Tech

2007-10-26 Thread Taylor, Cm
Colleagues,

=20

The following position in my department is still open and I encourage
potential applicants to have a closer look.  Having just started here
myself this semester, I can tell you that the department is in a new and
exciting growth phase.  Start-up funds and salaries are highly
competitive and the university offers much in the way of collaborative
opportunity, culture, and other scholarly activities.  Lubbock's
location puts several different river basins within easy reach (Pecos,
Brazos, Red, Canadian, and Colorado) and thousands of playa lakes dot
the surrounding landscape.  I would be pleased to provide more
information to interested folks. =20

=20

Chris Taylor

=20

=20

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT,

COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES,

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY, LUBBOCK, TEXAS

=20

POSITION:  Applications are invited for a tenure-track faculty position
at the Assistant Professor level. This is a 9-month teaching and
research position. Summer salary is dependent upon availability of
research grants. The successful candidate will be expected to develop a
research program addressing the conservation and management of aquatic
systems, teach undergraduate courses in the Fisheries Management
program, and develop a graduate course(s) in their area of expertise.

=20

THE DEPARTMENT:  The Department of Natural Resources Management consists
of 17 full-time and 14 adjunct faculty members.  About 160 undergraduate
students and 40 graduate students are currently enrolled. Degrees are
offered at the B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Range Science, Wildlife Science,
and Fisheries Science. The Department also administers a B.S. program in
Environmental Conservation of Natural Resources.  Intra- and
inter-departmental collaboration is common. The department administers a
research area near campus which holds several artificial ponds, a playa
lake, and storage and maintenance facilities.

=20

THE COLLEGE:  The College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources
includes six academic departments.  Enrollment is 1,200 undergraduate
and 265 graduate students.  Research and teaching programs are supported
by facilities on 20,000 acres consisting of 4 farms and an experimental
ranch.  Cooperative relationships exist between the College and the
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas Cooperative Extension, and
USDA-ARS.  The Texas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit is
housed within the College and is closely aligned with the Department.

=20

THE UNIVERSITY: Texas Tech University is one of four major
state-supported multidisciplinary universities in Texas. The University
consists of ten colleges, a School of Law, The Graduate School, and the
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center. Currently, 28,000 students
attend classes at the Lubbock campus. A newly created Water Center
resides within the College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural
Resources.  The Texas Tech Libraries are among the top 50 research
libraries in the nation and a pioneer in electronic resource offerings.
The university also administers a 411 acre field station on the South
Llano River in the Texas hill country.  The City of Lubbock is situated
on the Llano Estacado (Southern High Plains).  It has about 210,000
residents and moderate to low cost of living.=20

=20

QUALIFICATIONS: Applicants must hold a Ph.D. degree in related areas and
post-doctoral experience is preferred.  Preference will be given to
individuals with demonstrated ability to obtain extramural funding, and
to those individuals with expertise in one or more of the following
areas: fisheries management (including fish population dynamics or
genetics), limnology or aquatic ecology/entomology.  Ability to teach
and mentor students at the undergraduate and graduate levels is
necessary. Capability to organize and conduct research is essential.
Peer-reviewed publication of research results is expected of
departmental faculty.

=20

SALARY: Salary will be competitive and commensurate with qualifications
and experience. The individual will be eligible for a generous benefit
package made available to all faculty members at Texas Tech University.

=20

APPLICATIONS:  Applicants must use the on-line employment website at
http://jobs.texastech.edu http://jobs.texastech.edu/  (Requisition
number: 74830).  Additionally, applicants should have five reference
letters and original transcripts forwarded to: Christopher Taylor,
Department of Natural Resources Management, Texas Tech University, Box
42125, Lubbock, Texas 79409.  Review of applicants will begin 15
November 2007 and will continue until the position is filled.  For
questions or assistance please contact Chris Taylor at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (806-742-1983).

=20

Texas Tech University is an EEO/AA Institution

=20

=20

***

Dr. Christopher Taylor

Dept. of Natural Resources Management

Mail stop 2125

Texas Tech 

Fisheries/Aquatic Biology job at Texas Tech

2007-08-30 Thread Taylor, Cm
=20

=20

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT,

COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES,

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY, LUBBOCK, TEXAS

=20

POSITION:  Applications are invited for a tenure-track faculty position
at the Assistant Professor level. This is a 9-month teaching and
research position. Summer salary is dependent upon availability of
research grants. The successful candidate will be expected to develop a
research program addressing the conservation and management of aquatic
systems, teach undergraduate courses in the Fisheries Management
program, and develop a graduate course(s) in their area of expertise.

=20

THE DEPARTMENT:  The Department of Natural Resources Management consists
of 17 full-time and 14 adjunct faculty members.  About 160 undergraduate
students and 40 graduate students are currently enrolled. Degrees are
offered at the B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Range Science, Wildlife Science,
and Fisheries Science. The Department also administers a B.S. program in
Environmental Conservation of Natural Resources.  Intra- and
inter-departmental collaboration is common. The department administers a
research area near campus which holds several artificial ponds, a playa
lake, and storage and maintenance facilities.

=20

THE COLLEGE:  The College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources
includes six academic departments.  Enrollment is 1,200 undergraduate
and 265 graduate students.  Research and teaching programs are supported
by facilities on 20,000 acres consisting of 4 farms and an experimental
ranch.  Cooperative relationships exist between the College and the
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas Cooperative Extension, and
USDA-ARS.  The Texas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit is
housed within the College and is closely aligned with the Department.

=20

THE UNIVERSITY: Texas Tech University is one of four major
state-supported multidisciplinary universities in Texas. The University
consists of ten colleges, a School of Law, The Graduate School, and the
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center. Currently, 28,000 students
attend classes at the Lubbock campus. A newly created Water Center
resides within the College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural
Resources.  The Texas Tech Libraries are among the top 50 research
libraries in the nation and a pioneer in electronic resource offerings.
The university also administers a 411 acre field station on the South
Llano River in the Texas hill country.  The City of Lubbock is situated
on the Llano Estacado (Southern High Plains).  It has about 210,000
residents and moderate to low cost of living.=20

=20

QUALIFICATIONS: Applicants must hold a Ph.D. degree in related areas and
post-doctoral experience is preferred.  Preference will be given to
individuals with demonstrated ability to obtain extramural funding, and
to those individuals with expertise in one or more of the following
areas: fisheries management (including fish population dynamics or
genetics), limnology or aquatic ecology/entomology.  Ability to teach
and mentor students at the undergraduate and graduate levels is
necessary. Capability to organize and conduct research is essential.
Peer-reviewed publication of research results is expected of
departmental faculty.

=20

SALARY: Salary will be competitive and commensurate with qualifications
and experience. The individual will be eligible for a generous benefit
package made available to all faculty members at Texas Tech University.

=20

APPLICATIONS:  Applicants must use the on-line employment website at
http://jobs.texastech.edu http://jobs.texastech.edu/  (Requisition
number: 74830).  Additionally, applicants should have five reference
letters and original transcripts forwarded to: Christopher Taylor,
Department of Natural Resources Management, Texas Tech University, Box
42125, Lubbock, Texas 79409.  Review of applicants will begin 15
November 2007 and will continue until the position is filled.  For
questions or assistance please contact Chris Taylor at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  (806-742-1983).

=20

Texas Tech University is an EEO/AA Institution

=20