> Michael Halcrow wrote the following on 09/06/2007 08:42 PM:
> > To cut a long story short I discovered that the file became garbled
> > as soon as the length exceeded 255 bytes, and only when requested
> > through the apache web server!
>
> Then I am inclined to blame some sort of caching in Apa
markus reichelt wrote the following on 09/06/2007 10:06 PM:
* Michael Halcrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:08:32PM +0200, Stefan Farestam wrote:
Ok. Any guess as to what I need to change /update in my distro to
get this working? I use a stock kernel from kern
Michael Halcrow wrote the following on 09/06/2007 08:23 PM:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:08:32PM +0200, Stefan Farestam wrote:
Ok. Any guess as to what I need to change /update in my distro to
get this working? I use a stock kernel from kernel.org instead of
the one supplied by Ubuntu.
I don't
* Michael Halcrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:08:32PM +0200, Stefan Farestam wrote:
> > Ok. Any guess as to what I need to change /update in my distro to
> > get this working? I use a stock kernel from kernel.org instead of
> > the one supplied by Ubuntu.
>
> I don't t
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:31:54PM +0200, Stefan Farestam wrote:
> To cut a long story short I discovered that the file became garbled
> as soon as the length exceeded 255 bytes, and only when requested
> through the apache web server!
Then I am inclined to blame some sort of caching in Apache. If
Michael Halcrow wrote the following on 09/06/2007 05:51 PM:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 05:34:07PM +0200, Stefan Farestam wrote:
When using a directory encrypted with ecryptfs to serve an apache
webserver I am only getting garbage. The bizarre thing is that I have
no problem using the files from
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:08:32PM +0200, Stefan Farestam wrote:
> Ok. Any guess as to what I need to change /update in my distro to
> get this working? I use a stock kernel from kernel.org instead of
> the one supplied by Ubuntu.
I don't think anything that drastic is going to be necessary. The
k
Michael C Thompson wrote the following on 09/06/2007 05:55 PM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/06/2007
10:34:07 AM:
>
> Hi,
>
> When using a directory encrypted with ecryptfs to serve an apache
> webserver I am only getting garbage. The bizarre thing is that I
> have no problem using the file
Michael Halcrow wrote the following on 09/06/2007 06:12 PM:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 05:48:39PM +0200, Stefan Farestam wrote:
I just installed ecryptfs on my Ubuntu powered laptop and have
observed a few oddities. However, to make it easier to follow up, I
will split the issues into several
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 05:48:39PM +0200, Stefan Farestam wrote:
> I just installed ecryptfs on my Ubuntu powered laptop and have
> observed a few oddities. However, to make it easier to follow up, I
> will split the issues into several postings. I would also like to
> add that despite the problems
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 05:53:36PM +0200, Stefan Farestam wrote:
> Kent Yoder wrote the following on 09/06/2007 05:47 PM:
> >
> >Hmm, if you were serving files out of the lower mount, the headers of
> >the files would look the same like this... Is Apache pointed at the
> >upper mount?
> >
> Yes it
Hi,
I just installed ecryptfs on my Ubuntu powered laptop and have observed
a few oddities. However, to make it easier to follow up, I will split
the issues into several postings. I would also like to add that despite
the problems that I've observed I'm already getting more mileage out of
ec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/06/2007 10:34:07
AM:
>
> Hi,
>
> When using a directory encrypted with ecryptfs to serve an apache
> webserver I am only getting garbage. The bizarre thing is that I
> have no problem using the files from the encrypted directory when
> using other applications s
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 05:34:07PM +0200, Stefan Farestam wrote:
> When using a directory encrypted with ecryptfs to serve an apache
> webserver I am only getting garbage. The bizarre thing is that I have
> no problem using the files from the encrypted directory when using other
> applications
Kent Yoder wrote the following on 09/06/2007 05:47 PM:
Hmm, if you were serving files out of the lower mount, the headers of
the files would look the same like this... Is Apache pointed at the
upper mount?
Yes it is. The lower mount is $HOME/protected/encrypted which is mounted
as an overlay
Hmm, if you were serving files out of the lower mount, the headers of
the files would look the same like this... Is Apache pointed at the
upper mount?
On 9/6/07, Stefan Farestam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> When using a directory encrypted with ecryptfs to serve an apache webserver
Hi,
When using a directory encrypted with ecryptfs to serve an apache
webserver I am only getting garbage. The bizarre thing is that I have
no problem using the files from the encrypted directory when using other
applications such as emacs or the openoffice tools. To add to the
mystery, the
17 matches
Mail list logo
