Martin:
I am fine to use FixedPcd for value 0x0AFF. Have you plan to add this PCD in
your patch?
Thanks
Liming
From: Olivier Martin [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 11:51 PM
To: 'Andrew Fish'
Cc: Gao, Liming; Kinney, Michael D;
[email protected]
On Aug 4, 2014, at 8:50 AM, Olivier Martin wrote:
> The benefit of the FixedPcd was to be an easy alternative between the
> recommended constant value and the random number.
> A Firmware vendor might want to use a different canary value as the open
> source project.
>
I guess the PCD could
The benefit of the FixedPcd was to be an easy alternative between the
recommended constant value and the random number.
A Firmware vendor might want to use a different canary value as the open
source project.
Olivier
From: Andrew Fish [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 04 August 2014 16:44
To
On Aug 4, 2014, at 8:30 AM, Olivier Martin wrote:
> Recommended value does not mean unique value. Anyway, no one has commented
> whether this value should be kept in the code or be replaced by a PCD. So, I
> will keep the original code.
> I will send a new patchset in the next couple of minute
Recommended value does not mean unique value. Anyway, no one has commented
whether this value should be kept in the code or be replaced by a PCD. So, I
will keep the original code.
I will send a new patchset in the next couple of minutes to define this
class instance as NULL instead of BASE.
O
