Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-11-01 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
On 8 October 2015 at 21:56, Bill Paul wrote: > Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Bill Paul had to walk > into mine at 10:30:26 on Monday 24 August 2015 and say: > >> Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Ard Biesheuvel had >> to >> >>

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-10-08 Thread Bill Paul
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Bill Paul had to walk into mine at 10:30:26 on Monday 24 August 2015 and say: > Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Ard Biesheuvel had > to > > walk into mine at 10:22:59 on Monday 24 August 2015 and say: > > On 24

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-24 Thread Bill Paul
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Ard Biesheuvel had to walk into mine at 10:22:59 on Monday 24 August 2015 and say: On 24 August 2015 at 19:20, Bill Paul wp...@windriver.com wrote: Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Ard Biesheuvel had to

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-24 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
On 24 August 2015 at 19:20, Bill Paul wp...@windriver.com wrote: Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Ard Biesheuvel had to walk into mine at 10:06:10 on Monday 24 August 2015 and say: On 24 August 2015 at 19:02, Bill Paul wp...@windriver.com wrote: Of all the gin joints

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-24 Thread Bill Paul
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Ard Biesheuvel had to walk into mine at 10:06:10 on Monday 24 August 2015 and say: On 24 August 2015 at 19:02, Bill Paul wp...@windriver.com wrote: Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Ard Biesheuvel had to

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-24 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
On 19 August 2015 at 00:27, Laszlo Ersek ler...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/18/15 22:04, Paolo Bonzini wrote: On 18/08/2015 08:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: Personally, I would not mind deprecating GCC44, but the biggest question I would have is what toolchains do the latest UDK releases claim to

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-24 Thread Bill Paul
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Ard Biesheuvel had to walk into mine at 09:54:08 on Monday 24 August 2015 and say: On 19 August 2015 at 00:27, Laszlo Ersek ler...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/18/15 22:04, Paolo Bonzini wrote: On 18/08/2015 08:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-19 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
On 19 August 2015 at 09:53, Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org wrote: On 18 August 2015 at 22:29, Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org wrote: On 18 August 2015 at 22:03, Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org wrote: On 18 August 2015 at 19:35, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-19 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
On 18 August 2015 at 22:29, Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org wrote: On 18 August 2015 at 22:03, Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org wrote: On 18 August 2015 at 19:35, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org wrote: On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 17:52 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: On 18 August

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-18 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
On 17 August 2015 at 21:16, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org wrote: See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from dw...@infradead.org by twosheds.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On 2015-08-17 11:25:41, David Woodhouse wrote:

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-18 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
On 17 August 2015 at 20:53, Jordan Justen jordan.l.jus...@intel.com wrote: On 2015-08-17 11:25:56, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: On 17 August 2015 at 20:22, Jordan Justen jordan.l.jus...@intel.com wrote: Can't you use an elf-based GCC4.9 with the GCC49 toolchain instead? I'm not sure it makes

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-18 Thread Bruce Cran
On 8/18/2015 10:26 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: Ultimately, it would be useful to have a subset of platforms/toolchains that need to pass before a patch is accepted, but I am aware that we are still far away from anything like that. For internal use, I have set up some infrastructure that we can

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-18 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
On 18 August 2015 at 19:35, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org wrote: On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 17:52 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: On 18 August 2015 at 17:19, Jordan Justen jordan.l.jus...@intel.com wrote: Last time I checked, GCC44 ~ GCC49 all produced images roughly in the same ball park

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-18 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 08/18/15 22:04, Paolo Bonzini wrote: On 18/08/2015 08:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: Personally, I would not mind deprecating GCC44, but the biggest question I would have is what toolchains do the latest UDK releases claim to support. We also have the issue that every time I ask about

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-18 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 18/08/2015 08:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: Personally, I would not mind deprecating GCC44, but the biggest question I would have is what toolchains do the latest UDK releases claim to support. We also have the issue that every time I ask about deprecating a toolchain, Larry looks at

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-18 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
On 18 August 2015 at 22:03, Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org wrote: On 18 August 2015 at 19:35, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org wrote: On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 17:52 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: On 18 August 2015 at 17:19, Jordan Justen jordan.l.jus...@intel.com wrote: Last time I

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-18 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
On 18 August 2015 at 17:19, Jordan Justen jordan.l.jus...@intel.com wrote: On 2015-08-18 03:57:51, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: On 17 August 2015 at 20:53, Jordan Justen jordan.l.jus...@intel.com wrote: On 2015-08-17 11:25:56, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: MinGW generates PE/COFF not ELF, so much of the

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-18 Thread Jordan Justen
On 2015-08-18 03:57:51, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: On 17 August 2015 at 20:53, Jordan Justen jordan.l.jus...@intel.com wrote: On 2015-08-17 11:25:56, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: MinGW generates PE/COFF not ELF, so much of the linker command line is different, and it really deserves a toolchain of its

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-18 Thread Jordan Justen
On 2015-08-18 04:01:36, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: On 17 August 2015 at 21:16, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org wrote: On 2015-08-17 11:25:41, David Woodhouse wrote: On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 11:22 -0700, Jordan Justen wrote: Can't you use an elf-based GCC4.9 with the GCC49 toolchain instead?

[edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-17 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
This got a bit out of hand after I noticed the ELFGCC and UNIXGCC toolchains that needed some tlc as well. Anyway, this series aims to refactor the toolchains definitions for UNIXGCC, GCC44, GCC45, GCC46, GCC47, GCC48, GCC49, CLANG35, ELFGCC, CYGGCC and CYGGCCxASL so that they share as much of

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-17 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
On 17 August 2015 at 19:53, Jordan Justen jordan.l.jus...@intel.com wrote: On 2015-08-17 07:24:57, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: This got a bit out of hand after I noticed the ELFGCC and UNIXGCC toolchains that needed some tlc as well. Anyway, this series aims to refactor the toolchains definitions

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-17 Thread Jordan Justen
On 2015-08-17 07:24:57, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: This got a bit out of hand after I noticed the ELFGCC and UNIXGCC toolchains that needed some tlc as well. Anyway, this series aims to refactor the toolchains definitions for UNIXGCC, GCC44, GCC45, GCC46, GCC47, GCC48, GCC49, CLANG35, ELFGCC,

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-17 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 10:53 -0700, Jordan Justen wrote: UNIXGCC and CYGGCC are GCC 4.3 mingw based. Did this get tested? I think ELFGCC is unused at this point. (And has been since UnixPkg was deprecated.) I think we should deprecate all three of these toolchains. I would like to see

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-17 Thread Bill Paul
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, David Woodhouse had to walk into mine at 11:00:23 on Monday 17 August 2015 and say: On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 10:53 -0700, Jordan Justen wrote: UNIXGCC and CYGGCC are GCC 4.3 mingw based. Did this get tested? I think ELFGCC is unused

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-17 Thread Jordan Justen
On 2015-08-17 11:10:57, Bill Paul wrote: Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, David Woodhouse had to walk into mine at 11:00:23 on Monday 17 August 2015 and say: On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 10:53 -0700, Jordan Justen wrote: UNIXGCC and CYGGCC are GCC 4.3 mingw based. Did

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-17 Thread Scott Duplichan
...@infradead.org ]Subject: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options ] ]This got a bit out of hand after I noticed the ELFGCC and UNIXGCC ]toolchains that needed some tlc as well. ] ]Anyway, this series aims to refactor the toolchains definitions for ]UNIXGCC, GCC44, GCC45, GCC46, GCC47

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-17 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
...@linaro.org; jordan.l.jus...@intel.com; ]liming@intel.com; dw...@infradead.org ]Subject: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options ] ]This got a bit out of hand after I noticed the ELFGCC and UNIXGCC ]toolchains that needed some tlc as well. ] ]Anyway, this series aims

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-17 Thread Bill Paul
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Jordan Justen had to walk into mine at 11:22:15 on Monday 17 August 2015 and say: On 2015-08-17 11:10:57, Bill Paul wrote: Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, David Woodhouse had to walk into mine at 11:00:23

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-17 Thread Jordan Justen
On 2015-08-17 11:25:56, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: On 17 August 2015 at 20:22, Jordan Justen jordan.l.jus...@intel.com wrote: Can't you use an elf-based GCC4.9 with the GCC49 toolchain instead? I'm not sure it makes sense to 'upgrade' the UNIXGCC toolchain to be based on GCC 4.9 rather than

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-17 Thread Jordan Justen
On 2015-08-17 11:25:41, David Woodhouse wrote: On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 11:22 -0700, Jordan Justen wrote: Can't you use an elf-based GCC4.9 with the GCC49 toolchain instead? Not for testing LLP64, no. How/who is this helping? I'm not sure it makes sense to 'upgrade' the UNIXGCC toolchain to

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-17 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
On 17 August 2015 at 20:22, Jordan Justen jordan.l.jus...@intel.com wrote: On 2015-08-17 11:10:57, Bill Paul wrote: Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, David Woodhouse had to walk into mine at 11:00:23 on Monday 17 August 2015 and say: On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 10:53 -0700,

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-17 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 11:22 -0700, Jordan Justen wrote: Can't you use an elf-based GCC4.9 with the GCC49 toolchain instead? Not for testing LLP64, no. I'm not sure it makes sense to 'upgrade' the UNIXGCC toolchain to be based on GCC 4.9 rather than 4.3. I think GCC 4.3 was implicitly part of

Re: [edk2] [PATCH v2 00/16] unify GCC command line options

2015-08-17 Thread David Woodhouse
See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from dw...@infradead.org by twosheds.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On 2015-08-17 11:25:41, David Woodhouse wrote: On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 11:22 -0700, Jordan Justen wrote: Can't you use an