Re: [edk2] [Patch 0/2] Use correct field name.

2019-01-13 Thread Zeng, Star
; Aleksiy Subject: Re: [edk2] [Patch 0/2] Use correct field name. On 01/11/19 06:46, Eric Dong wrote: > ((Facs->Flags & EFI_ACPI_4_0_OSPM_64BIT_WAKE__F) != 0)) > > In above code, Facs->OspmFlags should be used instead. > EFI_ACPI_4_0_OSPM_64BIT_WAKE__F is a bit in OSPM Enabl

Re: [edk2] [Patch 0/2] Use correct field name.

2019-01-11 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 01/11/19 06:46, Eric Dong wrote: > ((Facs->Flags & EFI_ACPI_4_0_OSPM_64BIT_WAKE__F) != 0)) > > In above code, Facs->OspmFlags should be used instead. > EFI_ACPI_4_0_OSPM_64BIT_WAKE__F is a bit in OSPM Enabled Firmware > Control Structure Flags field, not in Firmware Control Structure > Feature

[edk2] [Patch 0/2] Use correct field name.

2019-01-10 Thread Eric Dong
((Facs->Flags & EFI_ACPI_4_0_OSPM_64BIT_WAKE__F) != 0)) In above code, Facs->OspmFlags should be used instead. EFI_ACPI_4_0_OSPM_64BIT_WAKE__F is a bit in OSPM Enabled Firmware Control Structure Flags field, not in Firmware Control Structure Feature Flags. Update all related code to use correct