Hello Ard,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 09:40:42AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 18 October 2016 at 03:50, Dennis Chen wrote:
> > Hello Ard,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 06:09:00PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> On 17 October 2016 at 09:54, Dennis Chen
On 18 October 2016 at 03:50, Dennis Chen wrote:
> Hello Ard,
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 06:09:00PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 17 October 2016 at 09:54, Dennis Chen wrote:
>> > Since ACPI spec defines the GIC base addresses (CPU interface,
>> >
Hello Ard,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 06:09:00PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 17 October 2016 at 09:54, Dennis Chen wrote:
> > Since ACPI spec defines the GIC base addresses (CPU interface,
> > Distributor and Redistributor*GICv3 only*) as 64-bit, so we should
> > define
On 17 October 2016 at 09:54, Dennis Chen wrote:
> Since ACPI spec defines the GIC base addresses (CPU interface,
> Distributor and Redistributor*GICv3 only*) as 64-bit, so we should
> define these corresponding base address variables as 64-bit instead of
> 32-bit. This patch
Since ACPI spec defines the GIC base addresses (CPU interface,
Distributor and Redistributor*GICv3 only*) as 64-bit, so we should
define these corresponding base address variables as 64-bit instead of
32-bit. This patch redefines them according to the ACPI spec.
Contributed-under: TianoCore
5 matches
Mail list logo