[edk2] Propose moving "ECR1263: Customized Secure Boot" to staging

us into one or more interpretations, I feel we should move this to a staging branch until this issue resolved. Thank you, Jeremiah Cox Microsoft ___ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Re: [edk2] TianoCore Community Meeting Minutes (stephano)

variety of reasons, best articulated by visiting the following: https://microsoft.github.io/mu/ Kind regards, Jeremiah Cox ___ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

[edk2] TianoCore Community Meeting Minutes

Finally finding time to respond to an older thread... >>> The was a concern raised over potential lock-in to Github's, specifically in >>> regards to history retention. >>> Several Github users brought up that this shouldn't be an issue. >> >> Hopefully they said more than that. >> What does

Re: [edk2] Community Discussion: General Code and Commit message standards

In GitHub, adding a link from a PR to an Issue is extremely easy: https://help.github.com/articles/closing-issues-using-keywords/ Use any of the following strings, followed by a number, in a PR description... close closes closed fix fixes fixed resolve resolves resolved For example: "Closes

Re: [edk2] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/Core: correct one coding style

Please ignore, testing DMARC issue -Original Message- From: edk2-devel On Behalf Of Bi, Dandan Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 7:16 PM To: Wang, Jian J ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org Cc: Zeng, Star Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/Core: correct one coding style Reviewed-by: Bi Dandan

Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce] Research Request

I did a further experiment for you: https://github.com/lersek/edk2/pull/2 I cannot rebase away my history from PRs... Hopefully you have a nice email trail too. -Original Message- From: Laszlo Ersek Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 2:02 PM To: Jeremiah Cox ; Brian J. Johnson

Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce] Research Request

mechanism to archive all metadata, that may still be acceptable. I propose that https://github.com/josegonzalez/python-github-backup may suffice. Thank you, Jeremiah From: Laszlo Ersek Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 1:48:18 AM To: Jeremiah Cox; Brian J

Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce] Research Request

Hi Stephano, Sean and I will put something together for GitHub by next Tuesday. Thank you, Jeremiah Cox (departing for Thanksgiving holiday... now...) -Original Message- From: edk2-devel On Behalf Of stephano Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 10:34 AM To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org

Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce] Research Request

Tuesday, November 27, 2018 1:34 AM To: Jeremiah Cox ; stephano ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org Subject: RE: [edk2] [edk2-announce] Research Request To add on Phabricator not supporting Travis CI - since Travis works exclusively with GitHub and has zero interest in supporting anything else, there a

Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce] Research Request

Cox Cc: Knop, Ryszard ; stephano Subject: Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce] Research Request On Tuesday, 27 November 2018 14:16:18 MST Jeremiah Cox via edk2-devel wrote: > Do we have data on what it takes to deploy and operate Phabricator > with Harbormaster or Jenkins? The up front devel

Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce] Research Request

Test PR submitted -Original Message- From: Laszlo Ersek Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 3:07 AM To: Brian J. Johnson ; Jeremiah Cox ; stephano Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce] Research Request On 11/27/18 22:55, Brian J. Johnson wrote: > On 11/27

Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce] Research Request

n and well-documented * Does it have comprehensive documentation? GitHub: Yes * Does it have a comprehensive programmatic API that enables extensibility, with numerous online examples? GitHub: Yes * Does workflow facilitate different server-enforced policies for different branches? Gi

Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce][RFC] Collaboration Software: Microsoft Teams

On the topic of Microsoft Teams, it has a free option, limited to 300 users. More than 300 users requires an enterprise license, starting at $8/user/month. There is a steep discount for some types of non-profits, but I don't know if we would qualify. More details on the offering here:

Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce] Community Meeting Minutes

Apologies on the late reply, I was on vacation for several weeks and just got back to this. Regarding "Patch Review System Evaluation", on the call, I disagreed with your conclusion, but that note is not captured below. My reading of the email and call discussions, I did not hear our

Re: [edk2] [edk2-announce] Community Meeting Minutes

their changes (where it makes sense to the community), but not throw garbage over the wall. I think there is some value in this endeavor. Kind Regards, Jeremiah From: Ard Biesheuvel Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 5:58 AM To: Jeremiah Cox Cc: stephano; edk2-devel@lists