On 2015-07-29 08:11:59, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Move to the parametrised generic GCC linker script and set 64 KB
alignment, instead of using the AARCH64 specific incremental linker
script for 64 KB alignment which is about to be removed.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheu...@linaro.org
---
ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress.dsc.inc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress.dsc.inc
b/ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress.dsc.inc
index 7e0d8ff4b6e6..d2f8f5aa6d41 100644
--- a/ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress.dsc.inc
+++ b/ArmPlatformPkg/ArmVExpressPkg/ArmVExpress.dsc.inc
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
#
[BuildOptions.AARCH64.EDKII.DXE_RUNTIME_DRIVER]
- GCC:*_*_AARCH64_DLINK_FLAGS =
--script=$(EDK_TOOLS_PATH)/Scripts/gcc-aarch64-64K-align-ld-script
+ GCC:*_*_AARCH64_DLINK_FLAGS = -z common-page-size=0x1
Nice. This seems like a big improvement.
common-page-size doesn't map exactly to 'image section alignment', so
there is a little bit of a disconnect here in terminology.
I think you said that something like
--defsym=IMAGE_SECTION_ALIGN=0x1 can't be used because it doesn't
work in the linker script. Is that right?
I guess if we added -z common-page-size=$(SECTIONALIGN_FLAGS) directly
in build_rule, then we might be able to use:
GCC:*_*_*_SECTIONALIGN_FLAGS = 0x1
That's not great either.
-Jordan
[LibraryClasses.common]
!if $(TARGET) == RELEASE
--
1.9.1
___
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
___
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
