Re: [edk2] [PATCH 5/6] MdeModulePkg/VariableRuntimeDxe: factor out boot service accesses

2019-01-09 Thread Zeng, Star

Hi Ard,

Some minor feedback added inline.

On 2019/1/4 2:28, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:

In preparation of providing a standalone MM based variable runtime
driver, move the existing SMM driver to the new MM services table,
and factor out some pieces that are specific to the traditional
driver, mainly related to the use of UEFI boot services, which are
not accessible to standalone MM drivers.

Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel 
---
  MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/TcgMorLockSmm.c |  18 +---
  MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/Variable.h  |  50 
+
  MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableSmm.c   |  59 
--
  MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableSmm.inf |   5 +-
  MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableTraditionalMm.c | 114 

  5 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)

diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/TcgMorLockSmm.c 
b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/TcgMorLockSmm.c
index 28aa2893c6f8..009d96c3a65e 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/TcgMorLockSmm.c
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/TcgMorLockSmm.c
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND, EITHER 
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED.
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 
-#include 
  #include "Variable.h"
  
  typedef struct {

@@ -419,8 +418,6 @@ MorLockInitAtEndOfDxe (
  {
UINTN  MorSize;
EFI_STATUS MorStatus;
-  EFI_STATUS TcgStatus;
-  VOID   *TcgInterface;
  
if (!mMorLockInitializationRequired) {

  //
@@ -458,20 +455,7 @@ MorLockInitAtEndOfDxe (
  // can be deduced from the absence of the TCG / TCG2 protocols, as edk2's
  // MOR implementation depends on (one of) those protocols.
  //
-TcgStatus = gBS->LocateProtocol (
-   ,
-   NULL, // Registration
-   
-   );
-if (EFI_ERROR (TcgStatus)) {
-  TcgStatus = gBS->LocateProtocol (
- ,
- NULL,   // Registration
- 
- );
-}
-
-if (!EFI_ERROR (TcgStatus)) {
+if (VariableHaveTcgProtocols ()) {
//
// The MOR variable originates from the platform firmware; set the MOR
// Control Lock variable to report the locking capability to the OS.
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/Variable.h 
b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/Variable.h
index 938eb5de61fa..11822575ac4d 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/Variable.h
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/Variable.h
@@ -924,4 +924,54 @@ VariableExLibAtRuntime (
VOID
);
  
+/**

+  Notify the system that the SMM variable driver is ready
+**/
+VOID
+VariableNotifySmmReady (
+  VOID
+  );
+
+/**
+  Notify the system that the SMM variable write driver is ready
+**/
+VOID
+VariableNotifySmmWriteReady (
+  VOID
+  );
+
+/**
+  Variable service MM driver entry point
+**/
+EFI_STATUS
+EFIAPI
+MmVariableServiceInitialize (
+  VOID
+  );
+
+/**
+  This function check if the buffer is valid per processor architecture and 
not overlap with SMRAM.
+
+  @param Buffer  The buffer start address to be checked.
+  @param Length  The buffer length to be checked.
+
+  @retval TRUE  This buffer is valid per processor architecture and not 
overlap with SMRAM.
+  @retval FALSE This buffer is not valid per processor architecture or overlap 
with SMRAM.
+**/
+BOOLEAN
+VariableSmmIsBufferOutsideSmmValid (
+  IN EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS  Buffer,
+  IN UINT64Length
+  );
+
+/**
+  Whether the TCG or TCG2 protocols are installed in the UEFI protocol 
database.
+  This information is used by the MorLock code to infer whether an existing
+  MOR variable is legitimate or not.


Add a line for return description?


+**/
+BOOLEAN
+VariableHaveTcgProtocols (
+  VOID
+  );
+
  #endif
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableSmm.c 
b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableSmm.c
index 8c53f84ff6e8..7245587052df 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableSmm.c
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableSmm.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
SmmVariableGetStatistics() should also do validation based on its own 
knowledge.
  
  Copyright (c) 2010 - 2016, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.

+Copyright (c) 2018, Linaro, Ltd. All rights reserved.
  This program and the accompanying materials
  are licensed and made available under the terms and conditions of the BSD 
License
  which accompanies this distribution.  The full text of the license may be 
found at
@@ -28,18 +29,15 @@ WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND, EITHER 
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED.
  #include 
  #include 
  #include 
-#include 
+#include 
  

Re: [edk2] [PATCH 5/6] MdeModulePkg/VariableRuntimeDxe: factor out boot service accesses

2019-01-09 Thread Zeng, Star

On 2019/1/10 10:33, Wang, Jian J wrote:

Laszlo,

Regards,
Jian


-Original Message-
From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2019 11:38 PM
To: Ard Biesheuvel ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Leif Lindholm ; Kinney, Michael D
; Gao, Liming ; Wang,
Jian J ; Wu, Hao A ; Jagadeesh
Ujja ; Achin Gupta ;
Thomas Panakamattam Abraham ; Sami Mujawar

Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] MdeModulePkg/VariableRuntimeDxe: factor out boot
service accesses

On 01/03/19 19:28, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:

In preparation of providing a standalone MM based variable runtime
driver, move the existing SMM driver to the new MM services table,
and factor out some pieces that are specific to the traditional
driver, mainly related to the use of UEFI boot services, which are
not accessible to standalone MM drivers.

Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel 
---
  MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/TcgMorLockSmm.c |  18

+---

  MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/Variable.h  |  50

+

  MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableSmm.c   |  59

--

  MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableSmm.inf |   5 +-
  MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableTraditionalMm.c |

114 

  5 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)


I *vaguely* feel like we should extract the new functions to
"PrivilegePolymorphic.h", rather than to "Variable.h".

Please see initial commit 00663d047fc9
("MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: move SecureBootHook() decl to new
header", 2017-10-10), and other commits that touched that file.

I realize this is not a 100% "constructive" suggestion, and I feel
appropriately bad about that. It's just that "Variable.h" has so many
internals that I feel it's not a good dumping ground for these new
functions. And the other header we have, looks closer in purpose.

For example, MorLockInitAtEndOfDxe() is already declared in
"PrivilegePolymorphic.h" (see commit f1304280435f,
"MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: introduce MorLockInitAtEndOfDxe()
hook", 2017-10-10).

Admittedly, now that we're going to have three separate builds of this
driver, dedicating a separate header file to each "shared between A and
B" relationship is getting a bit too complex. In retrospect, introducing
"PrivilegePolymorphic.h" may not have been a "scalable" idea, after all,
and I should have just dumped those functions all in "Variable.h".

IOW, I think
- targeting "Variable.h" now is inconsistent with earlier code,
- extending "PrivilegePolymorphic.h" is also suboptimal (although still
better than the previous option),
- adding yet another header might be technically correct, but it would
be over-engineering,
- asking you to merge "PrivilegePolymorphic.h" back into "Variable.h"
feels awkward, especially after I argued *for* "PrivilegePolymorphic.h"
at length, when I originally introduced it. :/

Sigh. Can the variable driver maintainers comment please?

(I still plan to regression-test this series, but I feel like I should
force myself to at least skim the variable driver patches, beyond
testing them. Because, next time I can't avoid working with this very
complex driver, I wouldn't like to be *completely* lost.)



I agree "PrivilegePolymorphic.h" is more appropriate place for them.
Maybe Star have different opinion.


At current situation, I prefer PrivilegePolymorphic.h. :)

Some minor feedback will be added in another reply.

Thanks,
Star




Thanks,
Laszlo


___
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel


Re: [edk2] [PATCH 5/6] MdeModulePkg/VariableRuntimeDxe: factor out boot service accesses

2019-01-09 Thread Wang, Jian J
Laszlo,

Regards,
Jian

> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2019 11:38 PM
> To: Ard Biesheuvel ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Leif Lindholm ; Kinney, Michael D
> ; Gao, Liming ; Wang,
> Jian J ; Wu, Hao A ; Jagadeesh
> Ujja ; Achin Gupta ;
> Thomas Panakamattam Abraham ; Sami Mujawar
> 
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] MdeModulePkg/VariableRuntimeDxe: factor out boot
> service accesses
> 
> On 01/03/19 19:28, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > In preparation of providing a standalone MM based variable runtime
> > driver, move the existing SMM driver to the new MM services table,
> > and factor out some pieces that are specific to the traditional
> > driver, mainly related to the use of UEFI boot services, which are
> > not accessible to standalone MM drivers.
> >
> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel 
> > ---
> >  MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/TcgMorLockSmm.c |  18
> +---
> >  MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/Variable.h  |  50
> +
> >  MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableSmm.c   |  59
> --
> >  MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableSmm.inf |   5 +-
> >  MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableTraditionalMm.c |
> 114 
> >  5 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> 
> I *vaguely* feel like we should extract the new functions to
> "PrivilegePolymorphic.h", rather than to "Variable.h".
> 
> Please see initial commit 00663d047fc9
> ("MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: move SecureBootHook() decl to new
> header", 2017-10-10), and other commits that touched that file.
> 
> I realize this is not a 100% "constructive" suggestion, and I feel
> appropriately bad about that. It's just that "Variable.h" has so many
> internals that I feel it's not a good dumping ground for these new
> functions. And the other header we have, looks closer in purpose.
> 
> For example, MorLockInitAtEndOfDxe() is already declared in
> "PrivilegePolymorphic.h" (see commit f1304280435f,
> "MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: introduce MorLockInitAtEndOfDxe()
> hook", 2017-10-10).
> 
> Admittedly, now that we're going to have three separate builds of this
> driver, dedicating a separate header file to each "shared between A and
> B" relationship is getting a bit too complex. In retrospect, introducing
> "PrivilegePolymorphic.h" may not have been a "scalable" idea, after all,
> and I should have just dumped those functions all in "Variable.h".
> 
> IOW, I think
> - targeting "Variable.h" now is inconsistent with earlier code,
> - extending "PrivilegePolymorphic.h" is also suboptimal (although still
> better than the previous option),
> - adding yet another header might be technically correct, but it would
> be over-engineering,
> - asking you to merge "PrivilegePolymorphic.h" back into "Variable.h"
> feels awkward, especially after I argued *for* "PrivilegePolymorphic.h"
> at length, when I originally introduced it. :/
> 
> Sigh. Can the variable driver maintainers comment please?
> 
> (I still plan to regression-test this series, but I feel like I should
> force myself to at least skim the variable driver patches, beyond
> testing them. Because, next time I can't avoid working with this very
> complex driver, I wouldn't like to be *completely* lost.)
> 

I agree "PrivilegePolymorphic.h" is more appropriate place for them.
Maybe Star have different opinion.

> Thanks,
> Laszlo
___
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel


Re: [edk2] [PATCH 5/6] MdeModulePkg/VariableRuntimeDxe: factor out boot service accesses

2019-01-08 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 01/03/19 19:28, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> In preparation of providing a standalone MM based variable runtime
> driver, move the existing SMM driver to the new MM services table,
> and factor out some pieces that are specific to the traditional
> driver, mainly related to the use of UEFI boot services, which are
> not accessible to standalone MM drivers.
> 
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel 
> ---
>  MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/TcgMorLockSmm.c |  18 +---
>  MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/Variable.h  |  50 
> +
>  MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableSmm.c   |  59 
> --
>  MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableSmm.inf |   5 +-
>  MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableTraditionalMm.c | 114 
> 
>  5 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)

I *vaguely* feel like we should extract the new functions to
"PrivilegePolymorphic.h", rather than to "Variable.h".

Please see initial commit 00663d047fc9
("MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: move SecureBootHook() decl to new
header", 2017-10-10), and other commits that touched that file.

I realize this is not a 100% "constructive" suggestion, and I feel
appropriately bad about that. It's just that "Variable.h" has so many
internals that I feel it's not a good dumping ground for these new
functions. And the other header we have, looks closer in purpose.

For example, MorLockInitAtEndOfDxe() is already declared in
"PrivilegePolymorphic.h" (see commit f1304280435f,
"MdeModulePkg/Variable/RuntimeDxe: introduce MorLockInitAtEndOfDxe()
hook", 2017-10-10).

Admittedly, now that we're going to have three separate builds of this
driver, dedicating a separate header file to each "shared between A and
B" relationship is getting a bit too complex. In retrospect, introducing
"PrivilegePolymorphic.h" may not have been a "scalable" idea, after all,
and I should have just dumped those functions all in "Variable.h".

IOW, I think
- targeting "Variable.h" now is inconsistent with earlier code,
- extending "PrivilegePolymorphic.h" is also suboptimal (although still
better than the previous option),
- adding yet another header might be technically correct, but it would
be over-engineering,
- asking you to merge "PrivilegePolymorphic.h" back into "Variable.h"
feels awkward, especially after I argued *for* "PrivilegePolymorphic.h"
at length, when I originally introduced it. :/

Sigh. Can the variable driver maintainers comment please?

(I still plan to regression-test this series, but I feel like I should
force myself to at least skim the variable driver patches, beyond
testing them. Because, next time I can't avoid working with this very
complex driver, I wouldn't like to be *completely* lost.)

Thanks,
Laszlo
___
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel


[edk2] [PATCH 5/6] MdeModulePkg/VariableRuntimeDxe: factor out boot service accesses

2019-01-03 Thread Ard Biesheuvel
In preparation of providing a standalone MM based variable runtime
driver, move the existing SMM driver to the new MM services table,
and factor out some pieces that are specific to the traditional
driver, mainly related to the use of UEFI boot services, which are
not accessible to standalone MM drivers.

Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel 
---
 MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/TcgMorLockSmm.c |  18 +---
 MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/Variable.h  |  50 
+
 MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableSmm.c   |  59 
--
 MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableSmm.inf |   5 +-
 MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableTraditionalMm.c | 114 

 5 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)

diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/TcgMorLockSmm.c 
b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/TcgMorLockSmm.c
index 28aa2893c6f8..009d96c3a65e 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/TcgMorLockSmm.c
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/TcgMorLockSmm.c
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND, EITHER 
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED.
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
-#include 
 #include "Variable.h"
 
 typedef struct {
@@ -419,8 +418,6 @@ MorLockInitAtEndOfDxe (
 {
   UINTN  MorSize;
   EFI_STATUS MorStatus;
-  EFI_STATUS TcgStatus;
-  VOID   *TcgInterface;
 
   if (!mMorLockInitializationRequired) {
 //
@@ -458,20 +455,7 @@ MorLockInitAtEndOfDxe (
 // can be deduced from the absence of the TCG / TCG2 protocols, as edk2's
 // MOR implementation depends on (one of) those protocols.
 //
-TcgStatus = gBS->LocateProtocol (
-   ,
-   NULL, // Registration
-   
-   );
-if (EFI_ERROR (TcgStatus)) {
-  TcgStatus = gBS->LocateProtocol (
- ,
- NULL,   // Registration
- 
- );
-}
-
-if (!EFI_ERROR (TcgStatus)) {
+if (VariableHaveTcgProtocols ()) {
   //
   // The MOR variable originates from the platform firmware; set the MOR
   // Control Lock variable to report the locking capability to the OS.
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/Variable.h 
b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/Variable.h
index 938eb5de61fa..11822575ac4d 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/Variable.h
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/Variable.h
@@ -924,4 +924,54 @@ VariableExLibAtRuntime (
   VOID
   );
 
+/**
+  Notify the system that the SMM variable driver is ready
+**/
+VOID
+VariableNotifySmmReady (
+  VOID
+  );
+
+/**
+  Notify the system that the SMM variable write driver is ready
+**/
+VOID
+VariableNotifySmmWriteReady (
+  VOID
+  );
+
+/**
+  Variable service MM driver entry point
+**/
+EFI_STATUS
+EFIAPI
+MmVariableServiceInitialize (
+  VOID
+  );
+
+/**
+  This function check if the buffer is valid per processor architecture and 
not overlap with SMRAM.
+
+  @param Buffer  The buffer start address to be checked.
+  @param Length  The buffer length to be checked.
+
+  @retval TRUE  This buffer is valid per processor architecture and not 
overlap with SMRAM.
+  @retval FALSE This buffer is not valid per processor architecture or overlap 
with SMRAM.
+**/
+BOOLEAN
+VariableSmmIsBufferOutsideSmmValid (
+  IN EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS  Buffer,
+  IN UINT64Length
+  );
+
+/**
+  Whether the TCG or TCG2 protocols are installed in the UEFI protocol 
database.
+  This information is used by the MorLock code to infer whether an existing
+  MOR variable is legitimate or not.
+**/
+BOOLEAN
+VariableHaveTcgProtocols (
+  VOID
+  );
+
 #endif
diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableSmm.c 
b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableSmm.c
index 8c53f84ff6e8..7245587052df 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableSmm.c
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/VariableSmm.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
   SmmVariableGetStatistics() should also do validation based on its own 
knowledge.
 
 Copyright (c) 2010 - 2016, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
+Copyright (c) 2018, Linaro, Ltd. All rights reserved.
 This program and the accompanying materials
 are licensed and made available under the terms and conditions of the BSD 
License
 which accompanies this distribution.  The full text of the license may be 
found at
@@ -28,18 +29,15 @@ WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY KIND, EITHER 
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED.
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
-#include 
+#include 
 #include 
 
-#include 
-#include 
+#include 
 
 #include 
 #include "Variable.h"
 
 extern VARIABLE_INFO_ENTRY   *gVariableInfo;
-EFI_HANDLE