OK I understood the reason now.
I tried to understand the relationship between AVDP, LVD, and PD, but failed.
The code below in Partition driver seems to say the LVD and PD are close to
each other.
Is it always true? If it is, I agree with the implementation.
//
// Cover the main VDS
On 9/17/2017 10:00 PM, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
Paulo,
With the change in partition driver, I suppose UdfDxe driver
only needs to take care of area covered by the partition descriptor.
But why StartMainVolumeDescriptorSequence() still reads
LVD, TD, and PD?
We still need the LVD again for a few
Paulo,
With the change in partition driver, I suppose UdfDxe driver
only needs to take care of area covered by the partition descriptor.
But why StartMainVolumeDescriptorSequence() still reads
LVD, TD, and PD?
I thought the UdfDxe driver's logic can be simplified a lot.
There should be no
This patch reworks the driver to support Partition driver changes.
Cc: Eric Dong
Cc: Paulo Alcantara
Cc: Ruiyu Ni
Cc: Star Zeng
Cc: Laszlo Ersek
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution
4 matches
Mail list logo