On 01/08/19 16:12, Gao, Liming wrote:
> Last, EFI_HII_KEYBOARD_PACKAGE_HDR structure definition doesn't follow UEFI
> spec. I remember we ever meet with the compiler issue for below style. GCC49
> may complaint it. I need to double confirm.
> typedef struct {
> EFI_HII_PACKAGE_HEADER
Thanks Liming, this exactly the reply I was hoping for.
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 03:12:11PM +, Gao, Liming wrote:
> EFI_GUID structure definition follows RFC UUID
> https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4122.txt. This RFC has no 64 bit
> boundary requirement. I don't know the background why UEFI spec
>
EFI_GUID structure definition follows RFC UUID
https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4122.txt. This RFC has no 64 bit boundary
requirement. I don't know the background why UEFI spec requires to align on
64-bit boundary. This may be true for early IPF arch. UEFI forum can clarify
its purpose. If no
edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Alexander
> Graf ; Gao, Liming ; u-
> b...@lists.denx.de; robdcl...@gmail.com; Kinney, Michael D
> ; Zeng, Star
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [RESEND PATCH v2 2/6] efi_loader: Initial HII database
> protocols
>
> MdePkg/MdeModulePkg maintainers - any comments?
On 01/08/19 10:51, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> MdePkg/MdeModulePkg maintainers - any comments?
>
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 01:28:00AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 01/07/19 20:22, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 07:29:47PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>
The UEFI spec (v2.7)
On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 10:51, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>
> MdePkg/MdeModulePkg maintainers - any comments?
>
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 01:28:00AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > On 01/07/19 20:22, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 07:29:47PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >
> > >> The
MdePkg/MdeModulePkg maintainers - any comments?
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 01:28:00AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 01/07/19 20:22, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 07:29:47PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> >> The UEFI spec (v2.7) explicitly requires EFI_GUID to be 64-bit aligned,
On 01/07/19 20:22, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 07:29:47PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> The UEFI spec (v2.7) explicitly requires EFI_GUID to be 64-bit aligned,
>> unless specified otherwise. See in "Table 5. Common UEFI Data Types":
>>
>> EFI_GUID -- 128-bit buffer containing
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 07:29:47PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 01/07/19 15:09, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > Apologies for late reply, back from holidays today.
>
> I'm going to snip a whole lot of context below, since I have no idea
> what project this is about, and/or what files in that project
On 01/07/19 15:09, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> Apologies for late reply, back from holidays today.
>
I'm going to snip a whole lot of context below, since I have no idea
what project this is about, and/or what files in that project (no diff
hunk headers in the context). Judged from the address list,
Apologies for late reply, back from holidays today.
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 05:30:25PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > >>> +struct efi_key_descriptor {
> > >>> + efi_key key;
> > >>
> > >> Hello Takahiro,
> > >>
> > >> with the patch I can start the EFI shell. But I am still trying to
11 matches
Mail list logo