DataHub has been deprecated. PI spec has removed it.
ReportStatusCode() could have many different implementations or be outputted to
different "channels", such as serial port, port80, datahub and so on.
So for your 1st question, need check your ReportStatusCode() implementation to
see if it sup
Thanks.
Yes, HOB memory can be tightly constrained, so we couldn't create HOB for every
variable header. Why is this particular 'merge operation'? It is because only
this variable may be inconsecutive, it can reduce the times of copy to stack
from flash obviously, and one sizeof(VARIABLE_HEADER
SDK7.1 works.
I suspect that guru made mistake on which macro should be updated.
At 64bit win7, we still use rc.exe in WINSDK_BIN rather than the one in
WINSDKx86_BIN. The macro to be updated should be WINSDK_VERSION.
DEFINE WINSDK_VERSION = v7.1<- I updated this from v6.0A to v7.1
DE
Hi, Ari
The patch is good, we will follow up the process to check in it. Thanks.
Best Regards,
Fu, Siyuan
From: Ari Zigler [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 7:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] Mtftpv6Dxe retransmission mechanism
Any upd
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 1:24 AM, ritul guru (riguru) wrote:
> I am using win64 OS windows7 and intel process.
>
> Changes I made to toold_def.txt, this is required to fix rc.exe error.
It looks like you changed tools_def.txt to use WIN SDK 7.0, rather
than 6.0. I wonder if that is the issue.
We
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Andrew Fish wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2013, at 8:05 AM, "Zeng, Star" wrote:
>> About whether it is really worth it to allocate the HOB in this case,
>> it is because we don't want to assume the potential call times of
>> platform.
>
> I agree that slower FLASH/ROM speed
Any update??
From: Ari Zigler [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 6:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [edk2] [PATCH] Mtftpv6Dxe retransmission mechanism
Hi,
Please review the attached patch for Mtftp6Dxe driver.
The issue:
1. TFTP protocol is based