Re: [edk2] Using the TCG protocol

Wow, missed that one. Going to do some more tests before I confirm, but it appears to work. Thank you ! Regards, Eric Viseur Etudiant Ingénieur Civil Electricien LinkedIn Profile 2014-03-18 12:38 GMT+01:00 Dong, Guo : > > > Hi, >

[edk2] proposal to handle invalid compiler warnings

Hi, I'm interested in feedback for the following BuildTools-related idea. Over the past months working with OVMF I have distilled the following conviction about invalid compiler warnings (false positives emitted for intended and valid C constructs): (1) gcc likes to warn about uninitialized loca

Re: [edk2] proposal to handle invalid compiler warnings

Hi, Why not just correct the sources to eliminate these mistakes? Sergey On 21.03.2014, at 13:53, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > Hi, > > I'm interested in feedback for the following BuildTools-related idea. > > Over the past months working with OVMF I have distilled the following > conviction about inva

Re: [edk2] proposal to handle invalid compiler warnings

On 03/21/14 11:25, Sergey Isakov wrote: > Hi, > Why not just correct the sources to eliminate these mistakes? > Sergey Very good question, thank you. First, because the sources are already correct, and the things to change are *not* mistakes. They are valid constructs that the compilers fail to r

Re: [edk2] proposal to handle invalid compiler warnings

On Fri, 21 Mar, at 11:46:53AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > > Do you build each one of your patches with sixteen (compiler, target > arch) pairs during live development? Increasing the latency of your > build cycle from like 1 minute to a quarter of an hour? And that's > supposing that you can fire off e

[edk2] is there any UEFI spec

Hi all, Is there any UEFI spec which defines the portion of NVRAM used by OS and BIOS. Is this got changed from 2.1 to 2.3.1 ? Regards Patrmeshwr -- Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is

Re: [edk2] proposal to handle invalid compiler warnings

On 03/21/14 13:15, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Fri, 21 Mar, at 11:46:53AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> >> Do you build each one of your patches with sixteen (compiler, target >> arch) pairs during live development? Increasing the latency of your >> build cycle from like 1 minute to a quarter of an hour? An

Re: [edk2] How to change default USB host mode to USB device mode

Thanks, I also figure it out that both EDK2 and AMI won't support OTG mode under UEFI. I guess someone will have to start this part. From: feng.t...@intel.com To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 06:29:07 + Subject: Re: [edk2] How to change default USB host mode to USB