n in which the amount of data delivered may be
less than the size of the buffer supplied.
Regards,
-Ken.
-Original Message-
From: Tian, Feng [mailto:feng.t...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 7:20 PM
To: Ken Taylor; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Tian, Feng
Subject: RE: USB Control Tra
OUT UINT32*Status
);
Regards,
-Ken Taylor
Phoenix Technologies, Ltd.
___
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
I think there are a couple of assumptions here that should be reconsidered...
First, it is not always the case that entry into SMM on one CPU will always
pull all CPUs into SMM. There are methods to deliver targeted SMIs via the
local APIC on some processors. In addition, I have 2nd hand
Hi Amit,
Maybe in UEFI the code in question crosses a cache line boundary when executed
in UEFI, with the loop or part of the instruction itself on one side of the
boundary and the rest on the other? At what point are you trying to execute
this code, is it still from the UEFI shell or have
Hi David,
I think EVT_TIMER is required functionality. Many drivers depend on it.
I know it goes away at runtime, but so do the rest of boot services. There's
nothing that can be done about that; even the BIOS timer tick was taken over by
all modern operating systems, so it wasn't reliably
To: Ken Taylor
Cc: Alain Gefflaut; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [edk2] Hardcoded IDE Controller B/D/F (0/1/1) in BdsPlatform.c?
Hi Ken,
That's what I had guessed -- thanks for confirming that it's platform specific.
In my use case, I actually want the code to work on multiple hardware
6 matches
Mail list logo
