eu...@linaro.org>; Justen, Jordan L
>> <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>; edk2-de...@ml01.01.org; Gao, Liming
>> <liming@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Fix runtime issue in XenBusDxe when
>> compiled with GCC5
>>
>> On 02/21/17 18:53, Anthony
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:19:03AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 02/22/17 09:54, Gao, Liming wrote:
> > Laszlo:
> > In edk2, I find the several functions with VA_LIST have no EFIAPI.
> > They may use VA_ARG() or call other functions, but they don't use
> > VA_COPY(). In Base.h, VA_ARG() is
sts.01.org] On Behalf Of
>> Laszlo Ersek
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 3:03 AM
>> To: Anthony PERARD <anthony.per...@citrix.com>
>> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>; Justen, Jordan L
>> <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>; edk2-de...@ml01
Jordan:
If enable -mabi=ms, EFIAPI and ms_var_list will not be required to be
defined, right? Do you verify it on X64 arch?
Thanks
Liming
>-Original Message-
>From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 8:00 AM
>To: Justen, Jordan L
usten, Jordan L
><jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>; edk2-de...@ml01.01.org; Gao, Liming
><liming....@intel.com>
>Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Fix runtime issue in XenBusDxe when
>compiled with GCC5
>
>On 02/21/17 18:53, Anthony PERARD wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 201
On 02/21/17 23:45, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On 2017-02-21 11:08:24, Rebecca Cran wrote:
>> On 2/21/2017 12:02 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>
>>> But in this case, the full edk2 codebase has to be grepped for
>>> VA_LIST-taking functions, and all of them must be flipped to EFIAPI, if
>>> they currently
On 2017-02-21 11:08:24, Rebecca Cran wrote:
> On 2/21/2017 12:02 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> > But in this case, the full edk2 codebase has to be grepped for
> > VA_LIST-taking functions, and all of them must be flipped to EFIAPI, if
> > they currently aren't EFIAPI. Covering just
On 2/21/2017 12:02 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
But in this case, the full edk2 codebase has to be grepped for
VA_LIST-taking functions, and all of them must be flipped to EFIAPI, if
they currently aren't EFIAPI. Covering just XenStoreVSPrint() seems
incomplete. (Note: CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib
On 02/21/17 18:53, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 06:07:15PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> CC Rebecca & Konrad
>>
>> On 02/21/17 17:39, Anthony PERARD wrote:
[snip]
>>> So, should I add EFIAPI to XenStoreVSPrint, as it is using VA_COPY?
>>>
>>
>> Hm, please help me jog my
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 06:07:15PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> CC Rebecca & Konrad
>
> On 02/21/17 17:39, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 06:59:28PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >> On 12/02/16 20:26, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >>> On 12/02/16 17:02, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On
CC Rebecca & Konrad
On 02/21/17 17:39, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 06:59:28PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 12/02/16 20:26, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> On 12/02/16 17:02, Anthony PERARD wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 07:43:24PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 12/01/16
On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 06:59:28PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 12/02/16 20:26, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > On 12/02/16 17:02, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 07:43:24PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >>> On 12/01/16 16:28, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> Hi,
>
> That might
mber 04, 2016 1:59 AM
> To: Anthony PERARD <anthony.per...@citrix.com>
> Cc: Justen, Jordan L <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>; edk2-de...@ml01.01.org;
> Gao, Liming <liming....@intel.com>; Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH 0/
, 2016 1:59 AM
To: Anthony PERARD <anthony.per...@citrix.com>
Cc: Justen, Jordan L <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>; edk2-de...@ml01.01.org; Gao,
Liming <liming@intel.com>; Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Fix runtime issue in XenBusDxe
On 12/02/16 20:26, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 12/02/16 17:02, Anthony PERARD wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 07:43:24PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> On 12/01/16 16:28, Anthony PERARD wrote:
Hi,
That might be only with the Xen part of OVMF but now that the GCC5
toolchains is
On 12/02/16 17:02, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 07:43:24PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 12/01/16 16:28, Anthony PERARD wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> That might be only with the Xen part of OVMF but now that the GCC5
>>> toolchains is used with my gcc (6.2.1 20160830, Arch Linux),
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 07:43:24PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 12/01/16 16:28, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > That might be only with the Xen part of OVMF but now that the GCC5
> > toolchains is used with my gcc (6.2.1 20160830, Arch Linux), OVMF fail
> > to boot in Xen guests.
> >
com>; Gao, Liming <liming@intel.com>; Zhu,
> Yonghong <yonghong@intel.com>; Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
> Cc: edk2-de...@ml01.01.org
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Fix runtime issue in XenBusDxe when compiled
> with GCC5
>
> On 12/01/16 16
On 12/02/16 01:58, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On 2016-12-01 12:54:34, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 12/01/16 21:06, Jordan Justen wrote:
>>> On 2016-12-01 10:43:24, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Hrpmf, wait a second, I do see something interesting: in this series you
*are* modifying APIs declared in a
To: Anthony PERARD <anthony.per...@citrix.com>; Justen, Jordan L
<jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <liming@intel.com>; Zhu, Yonghong
<yonghong@intel.com>; Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
Cc: edk2-de...@ml01.01.org
Subject: Re: [edk2]
On 2016-12-01 12:54:34, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 12/01/16 21:06, Jordan Justen wrote:
> > On 2016-12-01 10:43:24, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >> Hrpmf, wait a second, I do see something interesting: in this series you
> >> *are* modifying APIs declared in a library class header (namely
> >>
On 12/01/16 21:06, Jordan Justen wrote:
> On 2016-12-01 10:43:24, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 12/01/16 16:28, Anthony PERARD wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> That might be only with the Xen part of OVMF but now that the GCC5
>>> toolchains is used with my gcc (6.2.1 20160830, Arch Linux), OVMF fail
>>> to
On 2016-12-01 10:43:24, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 12/01/16 16:28, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > That might be only with the Xen part of OVMF but now that the GCC5
> > toolchains is used with my gcc (6.2.1 20160830, Arch Linux), OVMF fail
> > to boot in Xen guests.
> >
> > Here is the
On 12/01/16 16:28, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> Hi,
>
> That might be only with the Xen part of OVMF but now that the GCC5
> toolchains is used with my gcc (6.2.1 20160830, Arch Linux), OVMF fail
> to boot in Xen guests.
>
> Here is the result:
> X64 Exception Type - 06(#UD - Invalid Opcode)
Hi,
That might be only with the Xen part of OVMF but now that the GCC5
toolchains is used with my gcc (6.2.1 20160830, Arch Linux), OVMF fail
to boot in Xen guests.
Here is the result:
X64 Exception Type - 06(#UD - Invalid Opcode) CPU Apic ID -
RIP - 1F26AF6B, CS -
25 matches
Mail list logo
