On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:47:28AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >> I think the solution that saves the most on the *source* code size
> >> is:
> >> - introduce the BeIoLib class
> >> - duplicate the MMIO functions from BaseIoLibIntrinsic to the one
> >> BeIoLib instance that we introduce
> >> -
Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org>
>> Cc: michael.d.kin...@intel.com; edk2-devel@lists.01.org;
>> ard.biesheu...@linaro.org; Meenakshi Aggarwal
>> <meenakshi.aggar...@nxp.com>
>> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH edk2-platforms 01/39] Silicon/NXP: Add support
>> for Big
.@intel.com; edk2-devel@lists.01.org;
> ard.biesheu...@linaro.org; Meenakshi Aggarwal
> <meenakshi.aggar...@nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH edk2-platforms 01/39] Silicon/NXP: Add support
> for Big Endian Mmio APIs
>
> On 02/23/18 12:04, Pankaj Bansal wrote:
>
>
gt;; Leif Lindholm
> <leif.lindh...@linaro.org>
> Cc: michael.d.kin...@intel.com; edk2-devel@lists.01.org;
> ard.biesheu...@linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH edk2-platforms 01/39] Silicon/NXP: Add support
> for Big Endian Mmio APIs
>
> On 02/23/18 11:25, Udit Ku
On 02/23/18 12:04, Pankaj Bansal wrote:
> However Laszlo, with the method you suggest (using STATIC CONST
> UINT16 mOne), would it not add delay in each Mmio Operation ?
>
> I am concerned about boot delay using this approach.
The condition can be evaluated at compile time, so I expect
chael.d.kin...@intel.com; edk2-devel@lists.01.org;
> ard.biesheu...@linaro.org; Meenakshi Aggarwal
> <meenakshi.aggar...@nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH edk2-platforms 01/39] Silicon/NXP: Add support
> for Big Endian Mmio APIs
>
> On 02/23/18 11:39, Udit Kumar wrote:
&
d.kin...@intel.com; edk2-devel@lists.01.org;
> ard.biesheu...@linaro.org; Meenakshi Aggarwal
> <meenakshi.aggar...@nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH edk2-platforms 01/39] Silicon/NXP: Add support
> for Big Endian Mmio APIs
>
> On 02/23/18 11:39, Udit Kumar wrote:
&
Leif Lindholm
>> <leif.lindh...@linaro.org>
>> Cc: michael.d.kin...@intel.com; edk2-devel@lists.01.org;
>> ard.biesheu...@linaro.org
>> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH edk2-platforms 01/39] Silicon/NXP: Add support
>> for Big Endian Mmio APIs
>>
>> On 02/23/18
t;
>> Cc: michael.d.kin...@intel.com; edk2-devel@lists.01.org;
>> ard.biesheu...@linaro.org
>> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH edk2-platforms 01/39] Silicon/NXP: Add
>> support for Big Endian Mmio APIs
>>
>> On 02/22/18 12:52, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>>> On T
el.d.kin...@intel.com; edk2-devel@lists.01.org;
> ard.biesheu...@linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH edk2-platforms 01/39] Silicon/NXP: Add support
> for Big Endian Mmio APIs
>
> On 02/23/18 09:40, Pankaj Bansal wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> >> -Original Messa
; ard.biesheu...@linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH edk2-platforms 01/39] Silicon/NXP: Add support
> for Big Endian Mmio APIs
>
> On 02/22/18 12:52, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 09:34:05AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> >>> But
@nxp.com>; Leif Lindholm
>> <leif.lindh...@linaro.org>
>> Cc: michael.d.kin...@intel.com; edk2-devel@lists.01.org;
>> ard.biesheu...@linaro.org
>> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH edk2-platforms 01/39] Silicon/NXP: Add support
>> for Big Endian Mmio APIs
>>
el.d.kin...@intel.com; edk2-devel@lists.01.org;
> ard.biesheu...@linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH edk2-platforms 01/39] Silicon/NXP: Add support
> for Big Endian Mmio APIs
>
> On 02/23/18 09:40, Pankaj Bansal wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> >> -Original Messa
.org>
>> Cc: michael.d.kin...@intel.com; edk2-devel@lists.01.org;
>> ard.biesheu...@linaro.org
>> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH edk2-platforms 01/39] Silicon/NXP: Add support
>> for Big Endian Mmio APIs
>>
>> On 02/22/18 12:52, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>>>
ts.01.org;
> ard.biesheu...@linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH edk2-platforms 01/39] Silicon/NXP: Add support
> for Big Endian Mmio APIs
>
> On 02/22/18 12:52, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 09:34:05AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> >>> But
On 02/22/18 12:52, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 09:34:05AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> But that brings back the complication as to how we have a driver that
>>> needs an LE IO library to write output, and a BE IO library to
>>> manipulate the hardware.
>>
>> Can you please
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 09:34:05AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >> - As long as the specs are LE-only, "endianness opposite to the
> >> executing processor" is needless complication / speculative generality
> >> in my eyes.
> >
> > HTON/NTOH?
>
> I don't understand this reference; host-to-net
On 02/21/18 19:58, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 05:06:02PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 02/21/18 16:46, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>>> Apologies for dropping the ball on this series during my sabbatical.
>>>
>>> For this particular patch, I would still like to see a core library
> -Original Message-
> From: Leif Lindholm [mailto:leif.lindh...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 9:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH edk2-platforms 01/39] Silicon/NXP: Add support for Big
> Endian Mmio APIs
>
> Apologies for dropping the ball on
el@lists.01.org;
> ard.biesheu...@linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH edk2-platforms 01/39] Silicon/NXP: Add support
> for Big Endian Mmio APIs
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 05:06:02PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> > On 02/21/18 16:46, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > > Apologi
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 05:06:02PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 02/21/18 16:46, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > Apologies for dropping the ball on this series during my sabbatical.
> >
> > For this particular patch, I would still like to see a core library
> > provide the needed functionality. I just
On 02/21/18 16:46, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> Apologies for dropping the ball on this series during my sabbatical.
>
> For this particular patch, I would still like to see a core library
> provide the needed functionality. I just sent out an RFC of a possible
> implementation.
>
> Regardless, a key
Apologies for dropping the ball on this series during my sabbatical.
For this particular patch, I would still like to see a core library
provide the needed functionality. I just sent out an RFC of a possible
implementation.
Regardless, a key point is that this isn't about "big-endian", it is
23 matches
Mail list logo
