There is a source which produces M code words x1, x2xm.
Each code word is a sequence of N channel inputs. How do you find the
rate of this source?
Is it (ln M)/N or something else? How?
=
Instructions for joining and leaving th
I tried to fit the empirical distribution of a set of data to some
theoretical distributions (Say is gamma PDF). When I plotted the probability
density of the empirical data and the estimated gamma PDF, it seems that the
front tail (the side with ramping up!!) and the back tail (side with ramping
EugeneGall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: The Gallup organization posted a video to explain why the the increase in
: black's job approval for Bush is 'proportionate' to the increase among whites.
It makes no sense to talk of "proportionate" increases in percentages
Suppose you start at zero or 9
Hello ,
PLEASE CLICK HERE TO CONFIRM YOUR SUBSCRIPTION
http://www.getfreebonus.com/subscribeme.asp?[EMAIL PROTECTED]&confkey=z4657165
-- You must click the above link to begin receiving your newsletters! --
Thank You For Choosing GetFreeBonus.com !
Here are just a few of the great features that
His definition of proportionate would mean that if a group's approval of Bush
went from 1% to 31%, that too would be proportionate. The relative odds would
be one way of expressing the changes in proportions, but the absolute
difference (60% to 90% is roughly propotionate to an increase from 33%
there are two sets of data ... one for georgeDUBU ... and the elder george bush
here is what i glean from the charts
for george w ... the EVENT was sept 11 ... for the elder george bush ...
the EVENT was the gulf war ... and both were before and after ratings
1. whites approval rating for BOTH
The Gallup organization posted a video to explain why the the increase in
black's job approval for Bush is 'proportionate' to the increase among whites.
Both increased by about 30% (60 to 90 for whites, mid thirties to roughly 70%
for blacks), so the increase is proportionate, not disproportionat
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:00:06 +0100, "Jos Jansen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Rich Ulrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > On Wed, 09 Jan 2002 08:33:41 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > (Jukka Sinisalo) wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > We have two pots w
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dennis Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>sorry for late reply
>ranking is the LEAST useful thing you can do ... so, i would never START
>with simple ranks
>any sort of an absolute kind of scale ... imperfect as it is ... would
>generally be better ...
You can
A NEW Electronic BOOK on STATISTICS!
Dear Colleagues,
We are sending you the following announcement of a new book publication
of Prof. Dr. Victor Aladjev and believe you could be interested in this
subject matter. If you or your colleagues are not interested in this
publication, simply delete
"Rich Ulrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Wed, 09 Jan 2002 08:33:41 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Jukka Sinisalo) wrote:
>
> >
> > We have two pots with 25 plants each. After an identical treatment we
> > wait for a week, and then calculate h
11 matches
Mail list logo
