http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/322/7280/0
--
Warren S. Sarle SAS Institute Inc. The opinions expressed here
[EMAIL PROTECTED]SAS Campus Drive are mine and not necessarily
(919) 677-8000Cary, NC 27513, USA those of SAS Institute.
=
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Hayden) writes:
> ... Maybe we should just agree that if the margin is less than
> 0.5% on election night then we honestly say it's too close to call
That doesn't help. There could still be disputes about whether
the margin was less than 0.
I would prefer to blame the NY Times article on the ignorance of the
reporter rather than on the abdication of professional responsibility
by the statisticians involved, but clearly some big-name statisticians
need to respond to this article.
To suggest that there is no way to get a more accurat
In article <8o6564$7d3$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"William Levine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Without raising the specter of what IQ and SAT tests really measure, does
> anyone have any comments that might be helpful in telling students what to
> think about this?
The concepts of interval and ordin
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mark Everingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Dear all,
>
>Help appreciated on this problem:
>
>I have two classifier systems which take as input an image and produce
>as output a label for each pixel in the image, for example the input
>might be of an outdoor scen
In article <007201bfb639$d40ee400$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David A. Heiser) wrote:
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: Warren Sarle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 12:23 PM
> Subject: Re: no cor
In article <002501bfb563$e8e6e8e0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David A. Heiser) wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Herman Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 8:20 AM
> Subject: Re: no correlation assumption among X's in MLR
>
