Re: Comments about my syllabus

2000-06-22 Thread SAlbert
Stephen, I would also characterize the syllabus as too ambitious -- by far. Your students are probably scared of statistics, and overwhelming them will only make it worse. Unless you see a special need for it, for example, I'd omit time series in a first course! You might want to look at

Re: Comments about my syllabus

2000-06-19 Thread Paul R Swank
I found your syllabus to be very ambitious for undergraduates. Is this their first stat course? At 07:34 AM 6/18/00 -0400, SM wrote: Howdy, I am not a subscriber of this listserv, but was invited to post by E. Jacquelin Dietz, editor of THE JOURNAL OF STATISTICS EDUCATION. I am a social worker

Comments about my syllabus

2000-06-18 Thread SM
Howdy, I am not a subscriber of this listserv, but was invited to post by E. Jacquelin Dietz, editor of THE JOURNAL OF STATISTICS EDUCATION. I am a social worker (MSW with a Ph.D. in Sociology) and I teach two sections of statistics (to social work and criminal justice majors) at a small college

Re: Comments about my syllabus

2000-06-18 Thread dennis roberts
At 07:34 AM 6/18/00 -0400, SM wrote: Two issues that may not be clear on the syllabus: 1) I prohibit students from using a computer until they have solved the equation by hand first. I have discovered that students do much better on exams when they have done the math. For example, I can ask