Re: canonical correlation question

2001-08-18 Thread Elliot Cramer
Rich Ulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : I can believe someone would call it that, but I can believe other : tests would be called that, too. You state this is, in reference : to what test (what computer program, or what textbook)? see my other post : MANOVA is a canonical correlation problem.

Re: canonical correlation question

2001-08-17 Thread Rich Ulrich
On Fri, 17 Aug 2001 13:28:21 -0400, Paige Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Elliot Cramer wrote: > > [ snip, question ] > > > > The test of parallelism in mancova is an equivalent test I can believe someone would call it that, but I can believe other tests would be called that, too. You sta

Re: canonical correlation question

2001-08-17 Thread Paige Miller
Elliot Cramer wrote: > > Gardburyb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > : Hi all, > > : I'm new to the group. I'm doing my dissertation, and I am doing a canonical > : correlation analysis. My question is, what is the best way to compare canonical > > The test of parallelism in mancova is an equivalent

Re: canonical correlation question

2001-08-17 Thread Elliot Cramer
Gardburyb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : Hi all, : I'm new to the group. I'm doing my dissertation, and I am doing a canonical : correlation analysis. My question is, what is the best way to compare canonical The test of parallelism in mancova is an equivalent test =

canonical correlation question

2001-08-16 Thread Gardburyb
Hi all, I'm new to the group. I'm doing my dissertation, and I am doing a canonical correlation analysis. My question is, what is the best way to compare canonical equations between groups. That is, I did a canonical on the sample overall, but now I would like to see if there is a difference in c