vote counting

2001-07-25 Thread Sanford Lefkowitz
In a certain process, there are millions of people voting for thousands of candidates. The top N will be declared winners. But the counting process is flawed and with probability 'p', a vote will be miscounted. (it might be counted for the wrong candidate or it might be counted for a non-existent

Re: vote counting

2001-07-25 Thread Dennis Roberts
At 09:33 AM 7/25/01 -0400, Sanford Lefkowitz wrote: In a certain process, there are millions of people voting for thousands of candidates. The top N will be declared winners. But the counting process is flawed and with probability 'p', a vote will be miscounted. (it might be counted for the wrong

Re: vote counting

2001-07-25 Thread Donald Burrill
The answers to your questions depend heavily on structural information that you almost certainly don't have, else one would not bother to have arranged a voting process. But consider two very different cases: A. Voters are absolutely indifferent to candidates: that is, all the candidates

RE: vote counting

2001-07-25 Thread Lefkowitz, Sanford
]] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 11:33 AM To: Sanford Lefkowitz Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: vote counting The answers to your questions depend heavily on structural information that you almost certainly don't have, else one would not bother to have arranged a voting process. But consider

Re: vote counting

2001-07-25 Thread Rich Ulrich
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 09:33:41 -0400, Sanford Lefkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a certain process, there are millions of people voting for thousands of candidates. The top N will be declared winners. But the counting process is flawed and with probability 'p', a vote will be miscounted.