see what happens when i ... usually about once a year ... post a note
asking what value is there, if any, in classical statistical hypothesis
testing? the discussion runs amok ...
i love it!
and we wonder why STUDENTS have a difficult time in stat?
if we were to compile the dozens and dozens
T.S. Lim wrote:
In article 8d4f0o$g4$[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
Hi everybody,
I m looking for free Matlab programs wich perform bootstrap, jackknife
cross-validation, for neural netorks and regression (MLP).
Does anybody can tell me where I can find it ?
Hi everybody.
I face the problem of clustering one-dimensional data that can range in a
circular way. Does anybody knows the best way to solve this problem with no
aid of an additional variable ? Using a well-suitable trigonometric
transform ? Using an ad-hoc metric ?
Thanks.
Carl
dennis roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/07 2:46 pm
i was not suggesting taking away from our arsenal of tricks ... but, since
i was one of those old guys too ... i am wondering if we were mostly lead
astray ...?
the more i work with statistical methods, the less i see any meaningful (at
If your data can be "cut" and unrolled at a specific boundry then you
can rotate/translate the data away from the boundry. For example if
your data crosses the 0 degree boundry but not the -180/+180 boundry
then you don't need to do anything, if it crosses the -180/+180
boundry but not the 0
After I cited Stigler, to the effect that Quetelet never used the term
'normal' for the distribution,
on 14 Apr 2000 09:53:05 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan Hutson)
wrote:
Kendall and Stuart have a footnote attributing the term to Galton
however there is no reference
I thought that Stigler
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Rich Ulrich wrote:
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:53:05 GMT, Chuck Cleland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have an ordinal response variable measured at four different times
as well as a 3 level between subjects factor. I looked at the time
main effect with the Friedman
On 12 Apr 2000 15:21:21 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Bernhardt)
wrote:
I suspect in this forum, almost as bad as the F-word or N-word are the
DM-words... Data Mining... I agree, but wonder about criteria.
- since IBM started touting a product by that name, it is hard to
ignore the new
The normal distribution has often been called the Gaussian distribution,
although de Moivre and Laplace spoke of it well before Gauss.
The term "normal" had been used for the distribution by Galton (1877)
and Karl Person later recommended the routine use of that adjective to
avoid "an
Can anyone comment on the use of double mass analysis, a commonly
recommended technigue in hydrology texts use to detect a change in the
assumed linear relation between two variables? The method involves
plotting the cumulative values (in time order) of the two variables
against one another and
10 matches
Mail list logo