In sci.space.policy Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From the mind of Mick...
Jorge R. Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:nHxm7.59514$[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I do not understand why the United States
permits public radio hosts to
Michelle,
I think you have your standards set higher that it is
possible to meet. Or than it is necessary. And you
haven't considered how easy it is to FAIL the tough
standards
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001 13:25:24 +1200, Magenta
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ snip ]
My biggest problem with
[ taking it out of the HTML script ]
On 8 Sep 2001 22:14:58 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jay Warner) wrote:
[ ... snip, details of excellently devising a pragmatic measurement
on the job]
= start
Years later I discovered what I thought was a Likert Scale, so I
called what I had done a
lg*(lg(n)) and lg(lg*n)
lg* is iterated logarithm (base 2), defined as the smallest i such that
ith iteration of logarithm is less or equal one.
any information is greatly appreciated
=
Instructions for joining and leaving this
Hmm.. is there a good resource that discusses all the issues raised in this
thread? I've found your FAQ information very helpful - is there a spot
there for this type of discussion?
cheers
Michelle
Rich Ulrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
5 is 5 times 0?
Alan
dennis roberts wrote:
TO TALK about these things as ratio scales is downright silly
look at the item:
stat will help me in my professional work
don't agree |(0)__(5)__| agree
you aren't going to claim that the agree means 5
It is certainly true that the variable
X = distance from the left hand end of the line (in whatever units you
choose)
is a ratio variable, because the zero is not arbitrary.
But the variable
Y = level of agreement, recorded as distance from the left hand end of
this particular line
is not a
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 00:17:54 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neville X.
Elliven) wrote:
Context?
1587 Fleming Contn. Holinshed III. 1379/1 At hir being in Cambridge .
. thus did an academike write in praise of the forenamed earle.
1671 Milton P.R. iv. 277 Mellifluous streames that watered all the
