Title: RE: Mean and Standard Deviation
Well, what
about the standard normal distribution: N(0,1)?
Dale N. Glaser, Ph.D.
Pacific Science
Engineering Group
6310 Greenwich
Drive; Suite 200
San Diego, CA
92122
Phone: (858)
535-1661 Fax: (858) 535-1665
http://www.pacific-science.com
Title: RE: Standardized Confidence Intervals
Dennis..yes, the effect size index may be arbitrary, but for argument sake, say I have a measure of 'self-esteem', a 10 item measure (each item a 5-pt. Likert scale) that has a range of 10-50; sample1 has a 95% CI of [23, 27] whereas a
Hi there...some colleagues (I'm not on this project) have a question
regarding their research strategy..any suggestions would be most
helpful..thank you...dale
***
The situation:
1. Your job is to continuously monitor a 10 X 10 grid of fuses.
2. Each fuse has either a red
..thank you.dale glaser
=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=
.or even a recent finding re: the zero-order correlation of
height/weight would be very helpfulthank you.dale glaser
=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE
I also went to the following website and found the full text of the 1986
paper:
http://www.sghms.ac.uk/phs/staff/jmb/ba.htm
..dale glaser
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Rich Ulrich
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 7:29 AM
I know this has been mentioned before, but would someone be kind enough to
provide the info. on publisher/ISB # etc for the recently revised
Educational and Psychological Testing standards...thank you...dale
glaser
ranch of
economics applying statistical models, often models based on multiple
regression, to economic problem" (p. 93)..so interestingly, at least
based on the definition, and as opposed to psychometrics, there doesn't seem
to be much emphasis on measurement....dale glaser
---
as
you had to save fonts files in separate subdirectories, but now it's a lot
easierdale glaser
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Buoy
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2000 6:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re
/=(1 - .9) entails a multiple R of
.9486!!!; for me it is a stretch to conceive that collinearity only becomes
problematic when R = .9486...I'll be interested to see what others
think
Dale Glaser, Ph.D.
Senior Statistician, Pacific Science and Engineering Group
Adjunct faculty/lecturer
of the criterion variable is not problematic. However, there may be
occasions when violations of the error assumptions ensue and transformation
of the criterion variable serves in coaxing normality.dale
glaser
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
uery might be helpful.
-- Don.
On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Dale Glaser wrote:
A colleague sent the following to me at work today and after perusal of
various texts (Neter et al, Pedhazur, Cohen, etc.) I am unable to give
anything but an opinion...here is what he sent:
er, I also understand that variance components can be additive. Anyway,
if anyone has a general opinion I would be most appreciative as I am a bit
stumped on this one...thank you...dale glaser
===
This li
of this technique (i.e., related to gamma
distribution?)thank you..dale glaser
===
This list is open to everyone. Occasionally, less thoughtful
people send inappropriate messages. Please DO NOT COMPLAIN
I'm not sure if this will be pertinent to your field as it is written more
from a psychologist's reference, but for an excellent text try:
Cone, J. D., Foster, S. L. (1993). Dissertations and theses from start to
finish. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Dale Glaser
15 matches
Mail list logo
