Re: Sig. of correlation and t-test

2000-02-01 Thread Paul Gardner
boonlert wrote: > > Dear all > The result of paired sample t-test analysis from SPSS shows both a > significance(sig.) of paired sample correlation and a significance of paired > sample test but they are opposite interpretation (one is <.05, one >.05). > Could any one tell me why

Re: Sig. of correlation and t-test

2000-01-27 Thread Donald F. Burrill
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, boonlert wrote: > The result of paired sample t-test analysis from SPSS shows > both a significance (sig.) of paired sample correlation and a > significance of paired sample test but they are opposite interpretation > (one is <.05, one >.05). > Could any on

Re: Sig. of correlation and t-test

2000-01-27 Thread Rich Ulrich
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 20:29:29 +1000, "boonlert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear all > The result of paired sample t-test analysis from SPSS shows both a > significance(sig.) of paired sample correlation and a significance of paired > sample test but they are opposite interpretation (one

Sig. of correlation and t-test

2000-01-27 Thread boonlert
Dear all The result of paired sample t-test analysis from SPSS shows both a significance(sig.) of paired sample correlation and a significance of paired sample test but they are opposite interpretation (one is <.05, one >.05). Could any one tell me why they are different and how sh