In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Glen Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dennis Roberts wrote:
>> unless you had a table comparable to the z table for area under the normal
>> distribution ... for EACH different level of skewness ... an exact answer
>> is not possible in a way that would be expl
Dennis Roberts wrote:
>
> unless you had a table comparable to the z table for area under the normal
> distribution ... for EACH different level of skewness ... an exact answer
> is not possible in a way that would be explainable
Even if you specify level of skewness, an exact answer is still no
rmal, then
but you didn't say that.
Jay
Melady Preece wrote:
A
student wants to know how one can calculate the area under the curve for
skewed distributions. Can someone give me an answer about when a
distribution is too skewed to use the z table? Melady
--
Jay Warner
Principal Scientist
Wa
On 30 Jan 2002 08:02:51 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Melady Preece)
wrote:
> A student wants to know how one can calculate the area under the
>curve for skewed distributions. Can someone give me an answer about
>when a distribution is too skewed to use the z table?
It would be conv
C2 -0.9946 8.0984-0.7127 0.3921
At 07:27 AM 1/30/02 -0800, Melady Preece wrote:
>A student wants to know how one can calculate the area under the curve for
>skewed distributions. Can someone give me an answer about when a
>distribution is too skewed to use
> Melady Preece wrote:
>
> A student wants to know how one can calculate the area under the curve
> for skewed distributions. Can someone give me an answer about when a
> distribution is too skewed to use the z table?
You can only use the z table directly to find t
A student wants to know how one can calculate the
area under the curve for skewed distributions. Can someone give me an
answer about when a distribution is too skewed to use the z table?
Melady
