Re: Applied analysis question

2002-03-03 Thread Rich Ulrich
On 28 Feb 2002 07:37:16 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brad Anderson) wrote: Rich Ulrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... On 27 Feb 2002 11:59:53 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brad Anderson) wrote: BA I have a continuous response variable that ranges from 0 to

Re: Applied analysis question

2002-03-01 Thread Eric Bohlman
Rolf Dalin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brad Anderson wrote: I have a continuous response variable that ranges from 0 to 750. I only have 90 observations and 26 are at the lower limit of 0, What if you treated the information collected by that variable as really two variables, one

Re: Applied analysis question

2002-03-01 Thread Brad Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Bohlman) wrote in message news:a5o5b1$fi0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Rolf Dalin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IIRC, your example is exactly the sort of situation for which Tobit modelling was invented. Considered that (actually estimated a couple of Tobit models and if I use

Re: Applied analysis question

2002-02-28 Thread Brad Anderson
Rich Ulrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... On 27 Feb 2002 11:59:53 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brad Anderson) wrote: I have a continuous response variable that ranges from 0 to 750. I only have 90 observations and 26 are at the lower limit of 0, which is

Re: Applied analysis question

2002-02-28 Thread Dennis Roberts
At 07:37 AM 2/28/02 -0800, Brad Anderson wrote: I think a lot of folks just run standard analyses or arbitrarily apply some normalizing transformation because that's whats done in their field. Then report the results without really examining the underlying distributions. I'm curious how folks

Re: Applied analysis question

2002-02-28 Thread Rich Ulrich
On 27 Feb 2002 14:14:44 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dennis Roberts) wrote: At 04:11 PM 2/27/02 -0500, Rich Ulrich wrote: Categorizing the values into a few categories labeled, none, almost none, is one way to convert your scores. If those labels do make sense. well, if 750 has the

Re: Applied analysis question

2002-02-27 Thread Dennis Roberts
At 04:11 PM 2/27/02 -0500, Rich Ulrich wrote: Categorizing the values into a few categories labeled, none, almost none, is one way to convert your scores. If those labels do make sense. well, if 750 has the same numerical sort of meaning as 0 (unit wise) ... in terms of what is being

Re: Applied analysis question

2002-02-27 Thread Rolf Dalin
Brad Anderson wrote: I have a continuous response variable that ranges from 0 to 750. I only have 90 observations and 26 are at the lower limit of 0, What if you treated the information collected by that variable as really two variables, one categorical variable indicating zero or non-zero