I would consider it a unipolar extent scale Maybe the visual anchor should be
0 to 6 to aid association with the number line concept
Dennis Roberts wrote:
At 01:39 PM 2/27/02 -0600, Jay Warner wrote:
Not stressful 1__ 2__ 3__ 4__ 5__ 6__ 7__ Very stressful
just out of curiosity how
DMR, I should have read your previous posting more carefully I have now had
coffee
Not stressful 1__ 2__ 3__ 4__ 5__ 6__ 7__ Very stressful
is a question that has an extent response format The cognitive schema the
response format tries to invoke might be reinforced by anchoring with zero for
On 27 Feb 2002 15:01:24 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dennis Roberts) wrote:
At 01:39 PM 2/27/02 -0600, Jay Warner wrote:
Not stressful 1__ 2__ 3__ 4__ 5__ 6__ 7__ Very stressful
just out of curiosity ... how many consider the above to be an example of a
bipolar scale?
i don't
now, if we
At 09:51 AM 2/28/02 -0800, Jay Tanzman wrote:
I partially did this, insofar as I ran Pearson and Spearman correlations
between
several of the scales and, not surprisingly, the two correlation coefficients
and their p-values were similar. that issue is entirely a separate
one since the rank
At 01:39 PM 2/27/02 -0600, Jay Warner wrote:
Not stressful 1__ 2__ 3__ 4__ 5__ 6__ 7__ Very stressful
just out of curiosity ... how many consider the above to be an example of a
bipolar scale?
i don't
now, if we had an item like:
sad happy
1 . 7
THEN the mid point
J. Williams wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 15:17:55 -0800, Jay Tanzman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just got chewed out by my boss for modelling the means of some 7-point
semantic differential scales. The scales were part of a written,
self-administered questionnaire, and were laid out like
2. Perhaps more likely, your boss may have learned
(wrongly?) that parametric stats should not be done unless scales
of measurement are at least interval in quality.
I don't know if his objection was to parametric statistics per se, but he did
object to calculating means on these
Jay Tanzman wrote:
Jay Warner wrote:
Jay Tanzman wrote:
I just got chewed out by my boss for modelling the means of some 7-point
semantic differential scales. The scales were part of a written,
self-administered questionnaire, and were laid out like this:
Not stressful
Jay Tanzman wrote:
I just got chewed out by my boss for modelling the means of some 7-point
semantic differential scales. The scales were part of a written,
self-administered questionnaire, and were laid out like this:
Not stressful 1__ 2__ 3__ 4__ 5__ 6__ 7__ Very stressful
So, why or
