Re: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test

2005-12-06 Thread Laura Creighton
not solve the problem, but it is a way of using technology to move in the right directi on. I hope this is a better explanation than what I provided earlier. From: Rodrigo Senra [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: edu-sig@python.org Subject: Re: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test Date: Mon, 5

Re: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test

2005-12-06 Thread damon bryant
it ‘fast enough’ for operational use. What do you think? From: w chun [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: damon bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: edu-sig@python.org Subject: Re: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 23:46:32 -0800 The problems seemed to get much easier in the last

Re: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test

2005-12-06 Thread Scott David Daniels
damon bryant wrote: ... I have corrected the issue with the use of 'sum' (now ‘sum1’) and the I'd suggest total would be a better replacement than sum1. --Scott David Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Edu-sig mailing list Edu-sig@python.org

Re: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test

2005-12-06 Thread damon bryant
Total does make more sense. I've made the change to total. Thanks, Scott! From: Scott David Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: edu-sig@python.org Subject: Re: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 13:23:52 -0800 damon bryant wrote: ... I have corrected

Re: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test

2005-12-06 Thread Rodrigo Senra
[ Scott Durkin ]: Could it be argued that the goal be for all students to score 100% on the desired content? That is precisely my goal when I elaborate exams. No success so far ;o) [ Damon Bryant ]: No, students are not receiving a hard A or an easy A. I make no classifications

Re: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test

2005-12-06 Thread Scott Durkin
Damon, Thank you for your thoughtful response. In terms of the Python tests, I as well would hope that all my students (13- to 15-years-old) could answer questions based on the content shared - kind of in the spirit of the Computing for All/Core Knowledge (NoChildLeftBehind-ish? - not playing

Re: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test

2005-12-05 Thread damon bryant
Programming: Procedural Online Test Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 00:52:50 -0700 Hello Laura, That's better than the Abstract Algebra class I took as an undergraduate. The highest score on Test 1 was 19%. I got 6%! I retook the class from another teacher and topped the class. Liked the subject so much I took

Re: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test

2005-12-05 Thread damon bryant
: Rodrigo Senra [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: edu-sig@python.org Subject: Re: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:53:00 -0200 On 5Dec 2005, at 7:50 AM, damon bryant wrote: One of the main reasons I decided to use an Item Response Theory (IRT) framework

Re: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test

2005-12-04 Thread damon bryant
testing status, and view scores for all students. Do you know of any? From: Scott David Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: edu-sig@python.org Subject: Re: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 12:03:06 -0800 damon bryant wrote: As you got more items correct

Re: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test

2005-12-04 Thread Scott David Daniels
I wrote: ... keeping people at 80% correct is great rule-of-thumb goal ... To elaborate on the statement above a bit, we did drill-and practice teaching (and had students loving it). The value of the 80% is for maximal learning. Something like 50% is the best for measurement theory (but

Re: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test

2005-12-04 Thread Laura Creighton
In a message of Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:32:27 PST, Scott David Daniels writes: I wrote: ... keeping people at 80% correct is great rule-of-thumb goal ... To elaborate on the statement above a bit, we did drill-and practice teaching (and had students loving it). The value of the 80% is for maximal

Re: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test

2005-12-04 Thread Chuck Allison
Hello Laura, That's better than the Abstract Algebra class I took as an undergraduate. The highest score on Test 1 was 19%. I got 6%! I retook the class from another teacher and topped the class. Liked the subject so much I took the second semester just for fun. Testing and teaching strategies

Re: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test

2005-12-03 Thread Kirby Urner
I tweaked it now where all other browsers and OS combinations can access the computer adaptive tests. Performance may be unpredictable though. Damon OK, thanks. Worked with no problems. As an administrator, I'd be curious to get the actual text of missed problems (maybe via URL), not just

Re: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test

2005-12-03 Thread damon bryant
dissertation. By expanding the question bank, I'll be able to reach that goal. From: Kirby Urner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'damon bryant' [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: edu-sig@python.org Subject: RE: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 07:44:32 -0800

Re: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test

2005-12-03 Thread Scott David Daniels
damon bryant wrote: As you got more items correct you got harder questions. In contrast, if you initially got questions incorrect, you would have received easier questions In the 70s there was research on such systems (keeping people at 80% correct is great rule-of-thumb goal). See Stuff

[Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test

2005-12-02 Thread damon bryant
Hey folks! Lindel Grandel and I have been working on some Python questions for potential use in high schools, college, and employment. If you are interested in taking one of the online tests go to http://www.adaptiveassessmentservices.com and self-register to take one of two Python tests: one

Re: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test

2005-12-02 Thread Vern Ceder
In my opinion, you would get more responses if the testing system accepted a browser/OS combination other than IE/Windows Cheers, Vern Ceder (using Firefox and Ubuntu Linux) damon bryant wrote: Hey folks! Lindel Grandel and I have been working on some Python questions for potential

Re: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test

2005-12-02 Thread damon bryant
: [Edu-sig] Python Programming: Procedural Online Test Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 19:50:36 -0800 Similar comment. I'm on Windows but don't want to be tested by a service that won't let me use FireFox. I have tests too. Kirby -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED